Detecting peptidic drugs, drug candidates and analogs in sports doping: current status and future directions.
This review paper surveys the current landscape of analytical methods used in sports anti-doping laboratories to detect peptide-based drugs, drug candidates, and their analogs in biological specimens such as blood, serum, and urine. The authors describe the broad range of peptidic compounds subject to anti-doping scrutiny, spanning low-molecular-mass peptides (e.g., growth hormone-releasing peptides, ARA-290, TB-500, AOD-9604, CJC-1295, desmopressin) to intermediate-mass proteins (e.g., insulins, IGF-1, growth hormone, erythropoietin) and higher-molecular-mass biologics (e.g., stamulumab). The review outlines detection approaches including chromatographic-mass spectrometric, electrophoretic, immunological, and combined methodologies, emphasizing the challenge of proving exogenous origin at very low concentrations in limited sample volumes. A central finding is that a meaningful gap remains between what is technically achievable in detection and what is routinely practiced in day-to-day analytical workflows. Limitations of this paper include its nature as a narrative review rather than an original experimental study, meaning it synthesizes existing literature without generating new empirical data. It does not evaluate clinical outcomes or therapeutic efficacy of any compound discussed.
Why this grade: This is a narrative review article that synthesizes existing analytical and anti-doping literature; it generates no original experimental or clinical data of its own.
With the growing availability of mature systems and strategies in biotechnology and the continuously expanding knowledge of cellular processes and involved biomolecules, human sports drug testing has become a considerably complex field in the arena of analytical chemistry. Proving the exogenous origin of peptidic drugs and respective analogs at lowest concentration levels in biological specimens (commonly blood, serum and urine) of rather limited volume is required to pursue an action against cheating athletes. Therefore, approaches employing chromatographic-mass spectrometric, electrophoretic, immunological and combined test methods have been required and developed. These allow detecting the misuse of peptidic compounds of lower (such as growth hormone-releasing peptides, ARA-290, TB-500, AOD-9604, CJC-1295, desmopressin, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormones, synacthen, etc.), intermediate (e.g., insulins, IGF-1 and analogs, 'full-length' mechano growth factor, growth hormone, chorionic gonadotropin, erythropoietin, etc.) and higher (e.g., stamulumab) molecular mass with desired specificity and sensitivity. A gap between the technically possible detection and the day-to-day analytical practice, however, still needs to be closed.
Educational summary of published research — not medical advice. Full text is shown only where licensing permits.