Peptilotbeta

Latest research

The peptide literature, summarized and graded.

Every paper distilled to a plain-language summary with an honest evidence grade — from strong human trials to animal-only signals. 197 papers indexed and counting.

Ask the literature →
Filtered by #semaglutide · clear
Review

Current Insights and Future Directions on the Role of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Chronic Kidney Disease.

This narrative review examines the evolving role of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in managing chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly in patients with type 2 diabetes, obesity, and established cardiovascular disease. The authors summarize evidence from cardiovascular outcomes trials showing that GLP-1RAs are associated with reduced albuminuria and slower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline, with effects that appear additive to those of SGLT2 inhibitors. They highlight dedicated kidney trials—notably with semaglutide—suggesting slowed CKD progression and reduced mortality in diabetic patients with CKD. The review situates GLP-1RAs within a broader therapeutic framework alongside ACE inhibitors/ARBs, SGLT2 inhibitors, and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. The authors acknowledge key evidence gaps, including limited data in non-diabetic CKD populations and uncertainty around oral GLP-1RA efficacy and newer dual/triple agonists (GLP-1/GIP/glucagon). As a review, it does not generate new primary data and is subject to potential selection bias in the literature it incorporates. The authors conclude that GLP-1-based therapies represent a potentially transformative approach to improving weight, cardiovascular, and kidney outcomes in high-risk populations.

International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · Mar 2026DOI ↗
Limited · human

A Pharmacovigilance Analysis of Ocular Adverse Events Associated with GLP-1 Receptor Agonists.

This pharmacovigilance study analyzed ocular adverse event (AE) reports associated with five GLP-1 receptor agonists (exenatide, tirzepatide, dulaglutide, liraglutide, and semaglutide) using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2005 to 2024. Ocular AEs comprised 3.61% of all GLP-1 RA-related reports; the median patient age was 63 years, and 62.6% of reports involved female patients. Disproportionality analysis using reporting odds ratios (RORs) identified a statistically significant signal for ocular AEs associated with semaglutide, while exenatide showed a significant annual decline in proportional reporting (-5.15% per year). The authors note that semaglutide's signal may partly reflect its growing market dominance rather than a true differential risk. Key limitations acknowledged by the study include the absence of exposure denominators and comparator groups, vulnerability of FAERS to reporting bias (including under- and over-reporting), and inability to establish causality. The authors characterize the findings as hypothesis-generating and recommend clinician vigilance regarding ocular monitoring, particularly in populations already at elevated risk for diabetic eye disease, while calling for further prospective research to validate these associations and explore potential mechanisms.

Journal of clinical medicine · Mar 2026DOI ↗
🧪 TrialInsufficient

MODERN-Dental: Pediatric Obesity, Cardiometabolic Risks, And Periodontal Disease

Registered N/A interventional trial (not yet recruiting). The goal of this clinical trial is to assess whether adjunctive dental cleaning can enhance the effects of semaglutide in children with obesity. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer \[is/are\]: if dental cleaning will improve both oral health and metabolic outcomes beyond the effects of semaglutide alone. Participants will receive either dental cleaning and oral hygiene instruction or oral hygiene instruction alone.

ClinicalTrials.gov · Mar 2026View trial ↗
Moderate · human

Efficacy and Safety of Cagrilintide and Cagrisema Versus Semaglutide as Anti-Obesity Medications: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of cagrisema (a fixed-ratio combination of the amylin analogue cagrilintide and the GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide) and cagrilintide monotherapy compared with semaglutide monotherapy for obesity management. Researchers searched five major databases and ClinicalTrials.gov, ultimately including three randomized controlled trials comprising 3,545 participants. Using a random-effects model, the study found that cagrisema produced statistically significantly greater reductions in percentage body weight (mean difference –7.47%, 95% CI: –10.58 to –4.36) and absolute body weight compared with semaglutide alone. Cagrisema also demonstrated superior improvements in glycemic markers, including fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c, and in BMI. Lipid parameters and safety profiles were reported as broadly comparable between groups. The authors concluded that cagrisema showed greater weight-loss efficacy and glycemic benefit than semaglutide, with an acceptable tolerability profile. Limitations include the small number of included trials (n=3), potential heterogeneity across trial designs, and the relatively short follow-up durations typical of early-phase RCTs in this therapeutic area.

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · Mar 2026DOI ↗
Moderate · human

Obesity Treatments and Weight Changes in Clinical Practice After Discontinuation of Semaglutide or Tirzepatide.

This retrospective cohort study used electronic health records from a large health system in Ohio and Florida (January 2021–June 2025) to examine real-world obesity treatment patterns and weight changes among adults who discontinued injectable semaglutide or tirzepatide within 3–12 months of initiation. A total of 7,938 patients (mean age ~56 years; ~64% female) were included. The study found that within one year of discontinuation, roughly 19.6% restarted the same medication and 35.2% received an alternative obesity treatment (most commonly another medication). Patients treated for obesity lost a mean of 8.4% of body weight before discontinuation, while those treated for type 2 diabetes lost 4.4%. In the year following discontinuation, the average weight change was modest (+0.5% for obesity indication; −1.3% for T2D indication), but with considerable individual-level variability—meaning some patients regained weight substantially while others did not. Key limitations include the retrospective, observational design (precluding causal inference), potential confounding by unmeasured factors, and restriction to a single health system in two U.S. states, which may limit generalizability.

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · Mar 2026DOI ↗
Review

Tirzepatide and semaglutide: different twins?

This narrative review compares two incretin-based therapies — semaglutide, a selective GLP-1 receptor agonist, and tirzepatide, a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist — across their mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, therapeutic indications, and cardiovascular/renal evidence. The authors describe semaglutide as having a well-established clinical profile with demonstrated benefits in glycaemic control, body weight reduction, and cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Tirzepatide is presented as a newer agent offering superior weight loss and improvements in insulin sensitivity, with an expanding range of therapeutic indications, though the authors note its cardiovascular outcomes evidence is less mature than that of semaglutide. The review emphasizes that despite shared benefits in reducing HbA1c and body weight, the two molecules differ meaningfully in their pharmacological mechanisms and evidence bases, requiring individualized clinical decision-making. The authors frame both agents within a broader "incretin revolution" relevant to cardio-reno-metabolic prevention. As a narrative review, this paper synthesizes existing literature rather than generating new primary data, and therefore does not provide independent experimental evidence to confirm or quantify any specific clinical claims.

European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · Mar 2026DOI ↗
🧪 TrialInsufficient

SHAPE-ENDO: Pilot Randomized Trial of Multimodal Pre-Surgical Optimization Versus Standard Surgery in Patients With Obesity and Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer

Registered Phase 4 interventional trial (not yet recruiting). SHAPE-ENDO is a single-center, open-label, pilot randomized clinical trial conducted at Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge in Barcelona, Spain. The study will evaluate the feasibility, safety, and acceptability of comparing two treatment strategies in women with atypical endometrial hyperplasia/endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia or low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer and grade III obesity, defined as BMI ≥40 kg/m². Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two arms. The control arm will undergo standa

ClinicalTrials.gov · Mar 2026View trial ↗
Limited · human

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Brazil: Landscape of Consumption, Safety and Regulation.

This Brazilian retrospective regulatory surveillance study examined patterns of GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) consumption, pharmacovigilance reports, and product falsification alerts between 2020 and 2024. Researchers triangulated data from three official sources: national pharmaceutical sales records classified by the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) system, adverse event reports submitted to Vigimed (Brazil's national pharmacovigilance platform linked to the global VigiBase), and official counterfeit product alerts. The study found that semaglutide was the dominant GLP-1 RA in the Brazilian market. Consumption was heavily concentrated in higher-GDP regions, revealing a geographic and economic disparity that did not align with regional diabetes prevalence rates. Pharmacovigilance data revealed a notable proportion of reports associated with off-label use, suggesting potential gaps in clinical practice and regulatory oversight. Additionally, documented cases of counterfeit GLP-1 RA products highlighted supply chain vulnerabilities. The authors concluded that rising demand, widespread off-label use, and product falsification collectively require a coordinated regulatory response. Limitations include the retrospective and observational nature of the data, reliance on administrative and surveillance databases, and the potential for underreporting in pharmacovigilance systems.

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · Mar 2026DOI ↗
Limited · human

Factors influencing patient preferences for obesity pharmacotherapy: The triangulation of semi-structured interviews, photovoice study and focus group discussions.

This qualitative, multi-method study explored how adults living with obesity make decisions about initiating pharmacotherapy. Researchers used three complementary methods — semi-structured interviews (n=15), a Photovoice study (n=12), and focus group discussions (n=12) — to purposively recruit adults aged 18–70 with a BMI ≥27 kg/m² and at least one obesity-related complication, all of whom were naïve to obesity medications. Through triangulation of findings across all three methods, the study identified five key factors shaping patient preferences: (1) anticipated treatment efficacy, (2) adequacy of information and community support, (3) safety and tolerability profile, (4) treatment burden and lifestyle integration, and (5) logistical and structural barriers. Tirzepatide was the most preferred agent across all methods, largely due to its perceived weight-reduction potential, while semaglutide ranked second, aided by its broader societal familiarity. Perceived efficacy and information trustworthiness emerged as the dominant drivers of preference, with safety concerns consistently moderating enthusiasm. The study is limited by its qualitative design, modest sample sizes, and the fact that all participants were medication-naïve, which may limit transferability to experienced patients. The authors recommend clinicians engage in shared decision-making tailored to individual information needs and social contexts.

Obesity pillars · Mar 2026DOI ↗
Moderate · human

Trends in 1-year persistence and adherence among initiators of high-potency, weight loss-indicated glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists.

This large retrospective cohort study examined real-world trends in 1-year treatment persistence and adherence among commercially insured adults without diabetes who newly initiated high-potency, weight loss-indicated GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) — specifically semaglutide (Wegovy) and tirzepatide (Zepbound) — between January 2021 and June 2024. Using integrated medical and pharmacy claims data from approximately 17.9 million members, researchers identified 33,607 eligible new initiators. The study found that 1-year persistence nearly doubled over the observation period, rising from 33.2% in 2021 to 60.9% in the first half of 2024. Tirzepatide demonstrated notably higher persistence (approximately 64%) compared to semaglutide during overlapping availability years. The authors suggest that resolution of GLP-1RA product shortages, improved side effect and dose escalation management, and lifestyle support programs may have contributed to improving persistence trends. Key limitations include reliance on claims data (which cannot capture clinical nuance or patient-reported reasons for discontinuation), a commercially insured-only population limiting generalizability, and the inability to distinguish voluntary discontinuation from access-related gaps. The authors call for further research into discontinuation reasons and long-term cost-effectiveness.

Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · Mar 2026DOI ↗
Limited · human

Real-world 6-month persistence, adherence, and effectiveness of GLP-1 medications for overweight and obesity in a Medicaid population.

This retrospective, claims-based observational study examined real-world persistence, adherence, and weight-loss effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists (semaglutide/Wegovy) and the dual GLP-1/GIP agonist (tirzepatide/Zepbound) among 7,493 adults enrolled in Massachusetts Medicaid (MassHealth) who initiated treatment between July and December 2024. At 6 months, the study found moderate rates of persistence (60.8%, defined as no gap greater than 56 days between fills) and adherence (60.1%, defined as proportion of days covered ≥80%). Male sex and younger age were among the member-specific factors associated with lower persistence and adherence. In a subgroup of highly persistent and adherent members with prior authorization recertification data, both tirzepatide and semaglutide were associated with at least 5% body weight reduction at 6 months. Key limitations include the retrospective claims-based design, which cannot establish causality, the restriction to a Medicaid population limiting generalizability, and the weight-loss outcome being measured only in a select, highly adherent subgroup rather than the full cohort.

Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · Mar 2026DOI ↗
Review

Novel GLP-1-based Medications for Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity.

This review examines the landscape of next-generation glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-based therapeutics in clinical development for type 2 diabetes and obesity, building on the established success of semaglutide and tirzepatide. The authors survey a broad range of investigational agents that target multiple gastro-entero-pancreatic hormone receptors simultaneously — including GIP, glucagon, amylin, and peptide YY receptors — to produce synergistic effects on energy intake, storage, and expenditure. Specific agents discussed include maridebart cafraglutide (GLP-1 agonism/GIP antagonism), survodutide and mazdutide (GLP-1/glucagon coagonists), cagrilintide combined with semaglutide (CagriSema), amycretin (amylin/GLP-1 dual agent), and retatrutide (GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonist). The review also highlights the emergence of oral small-molecule GLP-1 receptor agonists such as danuglipron and orforglipron, which resist enzymatic degradation and may improve patient convenience. The paper does not present original clinical trial data; it synthesizes existing preclinical and clinical development evidence. As a narrative review, it does not meta-analytically pool outcomes, and the included agents are largely at Phase 1–3 stages, meaning long-term efficacy and safety data remain limited.

Endocrine reviews · Mar 2026DOI ↗
Strong · human

GLP-1 receptor agonists for weight loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

This systematic review and meta-analysis pooled evidence from 21 randomized controlled trials (n = 7,024 participants) to evaluate the weight-loss efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) compared with placebo or active comparators. Across 16 placebo-controlled trials, the study found that a substantially higher proportion of participants achieved weight loss with GLP-1-based agents (78.54%) than with placebo (26.53%), yielding a pooled odds ratio of 11.37 (95% CI: 8.10–15.98). A frequentist network meta-analysis using SUCRA rankings suggested that tirzepatide and semaglutide demonstrated the greatest relative efficacy among agents evaluated. The authors concluded that GLP-1 RAs significantly increase the likelihood of weight loss and support their role in clinical obesity management. Notable limitations include the use of a fixed-effect model despite potential heterogeneity across trials, a binary primary endpoint (any weight loss) rather than magnitude of weight loss, the absence of a pre-registered protocol, and inclusion criteria restricted to the past five years in English only. These methodological choices may affect the precision and generalizability of the pooled estimates.

Medicine · Mar 2026DOI ↗
Review

The Ethics of Ozempic and Wegovy.

This paper examines the ethical landscape surrounding semaglutide (marketed as Ozempic, Rybelsus, and Wegovy), a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist manufactured by Novo Nordisk and primarily used to treat type II diabetes. The authors note that semaglutide has garnered widespread attention beyond its diabetic indication due to its effects on appetite suppression and weight loss, earning it the popular label of a "miracle drug." The paper surveys a range of ethical concerns that have been raised in both governmental and public discourse — including issues around drug access and equity, medicalization of obesity, societal body-image pressures, and resource allocation — and critically analyzes whether these concerns are sufficient to advise against prescribing semaglutide for weight loss. The authors ultimately argue that, while many of the ethical objections raised are legitimate and deserve serious consideration, none individually or collectively constitute a conclusive reason to withhold semaglutide prescriptions for weight management purposes. As an ethics and policy review, the paper does not present original clinical trial data and offers no empirical findings on patient outcomes. Its conclusions are based on philosophical argument and literature synthesis rather than experimental evidence.

Journal of medical ethics · Feb 2026DOI ↗
Strong · human

CagriSema Versus Semaglutide Monotherapy or Placebo for Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with GRADE Assessment.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of CagriSema — a dual therapy combining the GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide with the amylin analogue cagrilintide — compared to semaglutide monotherapy or placebo in adults with obesity. The authors searched four major databases through July 2025 and identified four eligible randomized controlled trials encompassing 4,419 participants (CagriSema: 3,055; controls: 1,364). Pooled analyses found that CagriSema was associated with significantly greater percent body weight loss (Cohen's d: −1.38; 95% CI: −1.84 to −0.91), greater absolute weight reduction (mean difference: −11 kg), reductions in waist circumference (−9.41 cm), and lower systolic blood pressure (−7.06 mmHg) versus comparators. However, gastrointestinal adverse events occurred more frequently with CagriSema (relative risk: 1.32). Notable limitations include high statistical heterogeneity (I² = 94.8%) across the included trials, the small number of studies (n = 4), and the absence of long-term safety and cardiovascular outcomes data. The authors conclude that CagriSema demonstrates superior weight reduction compared with semaglutide or placebo, but that tolerability monitoring and longer-term evidence are warranted.

The American journal of cardiology · Feb 2026DOI ↗
Limited · human

Psychiatric Adverse Events and Administration Challenges Associated with GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Weight Loss: A Real-World Analysis.

This real-world pharmacovigilance study analyzed 40,253 adverse event reports submitted to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) involving semaglutide, liraglutide, and tirzepatide used for weight loss. Researchers applied disproportionality analysis—using proportional reporting ratios (PRR) and reporting odds ratios (ROR)—to identify safety signals beyond the commonly studied gastrointestinal, renal, and pancreatic effects. The study population was predominantly female (68.6%), with median ages varying by drug. Key findings included that semaglutide showed the strongest disproportionality signals for psychiatric adverse events, including anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation. Tirzepatide was associated with markedly elevated signals for injection-site reactions and indicators of misuse, such as incorrect dosing and off-label administration. Liraglutide showed a comparatively lower overall risk signal across these categories. Important limitations of this study include the inherent biases of spontaneous reporting systems (underreporting, confounding, lack of denominator data), the inability to establish causality, and the possibility that reporting patterns reflect prescribing trends or media attention rather than true pharmacological risk. The authors conclude that psychiatric monitoring and patient education warrant greater attention in clinical practice.

Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · Feb 2026DOI ↗
Review

Long-acting amylin-related peptides as therapies for obesity and type 2 diabetes.

This review examines the development and clinical progress of long-acting amylin-related peptides as treatments for obesity and type 2 diabetes. It traces the field from the first-generation amylin receptor (AMYR) agonist pramlintide—which acts centrally to induce satiety, suppress glucagon, and reduce post-meal hyperglycemia but had limited use as an insulin adjunct—to a new generation of non-aggregating, long-acting analogues. The authors describe advances in understanding the heterodimeric structure of amylin-calcitonin receptor complexes that have guided the rational design of these newer agents. Highlighted compounds include the dual AMYR/calcitonin-receptor agonist cagrilintide, the combination product CagriSema (cagrilintide plus semaglutide), and the unimolecular tri-agonist amycretin. Several monotherapy candidates (eloralintide, petrelintide, Met-233, AZD6234) are also discussed. The review notes that gastrointestinal side effects—chiefly nausea—are common during initiation but typically resolve with continued use, and highlights emerging preclinical and early clinical signals for potential benefits in fatty liver disease, diabetic kidney disease, and resistant hypertension. As a narrative review, it synthesizes heterogeneous sources and does not itself generate new primary data.

Peptides · Feb 2026DOI ↗
Animal only

Efficacy of GLP-1 analog peptides, semaglutide, tirzepatide, and retatrutide on MC4R deficient obesity and their comparison.

This animal study investigated the anti-obesity effects of three GLP-1 receptor agonist peptides — semaglutide, tirzepatide, and retatrutide — in melanocortin 4 receptor knockout (MC4R KO) mice, a model of genetically driven obesity caused by disruption of the POMC-MC4R signaling pathway. All three compounds were administered for 21 days, after which body weight, body composition, metabolic markers, liver health, and gene expression were assessed. The study found that all three GLP-1 analogs produced statistically significant reductions in body weight, with tirzepatide showing the greatest effect (approximately 31.6%), followed by retatrutide (approximately 24.1%) and semaglutide (approximately 19.7%). All three agents reduced both fat and lean mass, improved plasma insulin levels and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), lowered cholesterol, and reduced markers of liver damage (AST and ALT) as well as liver hypertrophy. Gene expression analysis showed suppression of fatty acid synthesis genes, but no significant effect on inflammatory gene expression. Energy expenditure was reduced by all agents; only tirzepatide significantly decreased the respiratory quotient. A key limitation is that this is a mouse model study, and findings may not directly translate to humans. The authors suggest MC4R KO mice are a valid model for studying obesity-related drug efficacy.

International journal of obesity (2005) · Feb 2026DOI ↗
Insufficient

Compounded Semaglutide and Tirzepatide Products Use Unique Formulations but Efficacy and Safety Largely Unknown.

This study investigated compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide products being sold by compounding pharmacies following the resolution of the innovator drug shortage. Researchers conducted a Google-based search of compounding pharmacy websites between February and March 2025, identifying 33 unique compounded GLP-1 products. Two-thirds contained semaglutide and one-third contained tirzepatide. Nearly half of the products combined the active GLP-1 ingredient with additional agents such as cyanocobalamin, glycine, niacinamide, docusate, or ondansetron. Single-ingredient products were predominantly offered in sublingual (82%) or oral disintegrating tablet (ODT) (18%) formulations. The study found that the vast majority of products lacked transparency around beyond-use dating and storage conditions. The authors concluded there was little scientific justification for adding nutrients or docusate sodium to these formulations; while ondansetron co-formulation had a theoretical rationale, evidence for subcutaneous delivery was absent. Sublingual and ODT formats also lacked comparative evidence against FDA-approved oral tablets. A key limitation is that this was an observational web survey, not a clinical study, so no safety or efficacy data on patients were collected or analyzed.

The Annals of pharmacotherapy · Feb 2026DOI ↗
In vitro

In vitro metabolic profiling of weight-loss-inducing amylin receptor agonists in the context of preventive doping research.

This study investigated the metabolic profiles of three amylin receptor agonists — pramlintide, cagrilintide, and KBP-066 — in the context of sports anti-doping research. Motivated by growing concerns about misuse of weight-loss peptide hormones in athletic disciplines where weight management is performance-relevant, researchers used comprehensive in vitro models (human skin and kidney S9 fractions, biological fluids) to characterize how these compounds are broken down. High-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (HRMS/MS) was used to identify metabolites, and authentic post-administration rat plasma samples were analyzed for cagrilintide to assess in vivo relevance. The study found that all three peptides underwent N-terminal and C-terminal degradation, producing multiple stable metabolites considered suitable as analytical detection targets. Metabolites predicted from in vitro experiments for cagrilintide were confirmed in rat plasma samples. The researchers developed and validated an LC-MS/MS-based detection method applicable to anti-doping screening. Limitations include the primary reliance on in vitro models; the only in vivo data came from rat samples, not humans. This represents the first systematic metabolic characterization of these three compounds in an anti-doping context and lays groundwork for future human monitoring programs.

Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis · Feb 2026DOI ↗