Limited · human
This case report describes the use of Mazdutide, a dual glucagon-like peptide-1/glucagon receptor (GLP-1/GCGR) agonist, in a 15-year-old male presenting with obesity (BMI 30.64 kg/m²), type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 9.60%), and hyperuricemia (serum uric acid 511 µmol/L). The patient received a dose-escalation regimen of subcutaneous once-weekly Mazdutide alongside metformin and insulin over 36 weeks. The authors report substantial improvements across multiple metabolic parameters: body weight decreased by 16.8 kg (18.89% BMI reduction), HbA1c fell by 21.88%, and serum uric acid dropped by 37.00%. Lipid outcomes also improved, with triglycerides declining 69.02%, total cholesterol 13.65%, and LDL cholesterol 17.27%. Hepatic steatosis, confirmed by ultrasound, resolved by week 14. No hypoglycemic episodes or other adverse events were reported, and benefits were described as sustained after treatment ended. Key limitations include the single-patient design, the absence of a control condition, and the concurrent use of metformin and insulin, making it impossible to attribute outcomes specifically to Mazdutide. These preliminary observations may inform future controlled studies in adolescent populations.
Frontiers in endocrinology · Sep 2025DOI ↗ Review
This review paper examines the challenge of preserving muscle mass during weight loss induced by GLP-1–based pharmacotherapies, including GLP-1 receptor agonists (e.g., semaglutide), dual GLP-1/GIP agonists (e.g., tirzepatide), and triple GLP-1/GIP/glucagon agonists (e.g., retatrutide). The authors note that while these agents can produce clinically meaningful weight loss (5–10% or more of body weight), a portion of that loss comes from lean mass, including skeletal muscle, which may contribute to long-term weight regain and increase the risk of sarcopenia. The paper discusses the biology of myokines—over 600 signaling proteins released during muscle contraction identified in human myocyte research—as potentially important targets for protecting or expanding muscle mass. The authors explore emerging anti-obesity agents and their potential combinations with incretin-based therapies to preferentially reduce fat mass while sparing or building muscle. The paper calls for further research to clarify the functional consequences of lean mass changes during weight loss and maintenance. As a narrative review, it synthesizes existing literature without conducting original trials, and no new clinical data are presented. Generalizability is limited by the review format and the evolving evidence base for newer agents.
World journal of diabetes · Sep 2025DOI ↗ Strong · human
This systematic review and meta-analysis pooled data from 25 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving approximately 2,600 patients to evaluate the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) — including liraglutide, exenatide, dulaglutide, semaglutide, tirzepatide, efinopegdutide, survodutide, and retatrutide — on metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Across a median treatment period of 24 weeks, the authors reported that GLP-1RAs were associated with a statistically significant mean reduction in liver fat content of 5.21%, with retatrutide showing the largest effect. Histological analyses suggested significant improvements in steatosis, hepatocellular ballooning, and lobular inflammation, though improvements in fibrosis did not reach statistical significance. Liver enzymes (ALT, AST, γ-GT) and liver stiffness also improved significantly, with semaglutide showing the most pronounced effect on stiffness. No liver-related adverse drug effects were identified. Limitations include heterogeneity across trials, variable treatment durations, and the relatively short median follow-up, which may be insufficient to capture fibrosis outcomes. The evidence base is derived entirely from RCTs in human populations.
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · Sep 2025DOI ↗ Moderate · human
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the risk of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer associated with GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), including dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, semaglutide, beinaglutide, retatrutide, and tirzepatide. Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, ultimately including 62 randomised controlled trials encompassing 66,232 patients with a mean age of 58.3 years and a mean follow-up of approximately 43.5 weeks. The pooled analysis found a statistically significant increase in pancreatitis risk overall (RR: 1.44, 95% CI 1.09–1.89); however, this significance disappeared when results were stratified by background medication use, suggesting that concomitant medications may be a confounding factor. For pancreatic cancer, no significant overall association was identified (RR: 1.30, 95% CI 0.86–1.97), though a significant signal emerged in the subgroup taking background medications (RR: 1.85, 95% CI 1.05–3.26). The authors note this subgroup finding may be an artifact, as many excluded trials had zero events in both arms. Key limitations include variable follow-up durations, heterogeneous patient populations, and the influence of concomitant therapies, which complicate causal attribution to GLP-1 RAs alone.
Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · Sep 2025DOI ↗ Moderate · human
This systematic review and meta-analysis pooled data from 33 randomized controlled trials (n = 12,028 adults with overweight or obesity) to evaluate whether combining lifestyle modifications with GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) produces greater improvements in body weight and cardiometabolic markers than lifestyle modification plus placebo. Searches covered PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library through May 2025, and the protocol was pre-registered on PROSPERO. The study found that the combination therapy was associated with a statistically significant mean weight reduction of 7.13 kg, along with improvements in waist circumference, fat mass, systolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL cholesterol. HDL cholesterol did not show a significant change. Subgroup analyses suggested that longer treatment duration, use of semaglutide or tirzepatide, weekly dosing, and trials conducted in North America were associated with larger weight loss effects. No included trials were rated high risk of bias. GRADE certainty ranged from low to high across outcomes, with heterogeneity and potential publication bias limiting confidence in several findings. The authors conclude that results should be interpreted cautiously given this variability in evidence certainty.
EClinicalMedicine · Aug 2025DOI ↗ Review
This review examines the evolving pharmacological landscape for obesity management, with a focus on gut-brain axis hormones and their therapeutic potential. The authors describe how nutrient-stimulated gastroenteropancreatic hormones — including GLP-1, GIP, glucagon, and amylin — have become central targets in obesity drug development. The review covers both marketed agents and those in ongoing clinical trials. GLP-1 receptor agonists (e.g., weekly injectable or daily oral semaglutide) are reported to achieve roughly 15–17% weight loss with a favorable safety profile. The dual GLP-1/GIP agonist tirzepatide is described as achieving up to approximately 22.5% weight loss at higher doses. Combination therapies under investigation — such as cagrilintide plus semaglutide (Cagrisema), GLP-1/glucagon co-agonists, and the triple agonist retatrutide (GLP-1/GIP/glucagon) — are noted as potentially reaching weight loss comparable to bariatric surgery. The review also discusses cardiometabolic benefits and challenges around long-term treatment adherence for both patients and clinicians. As a narrative review, it synthesizes existing trial data rather than generating new primary evidence, and conclusions depend on the quality of the underlying studies cited.
Medicina clinica · Aug 2025DOI ↗ Limited · human
This Phase 1 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial examined the safety and efficacy of mazdutide — a dual glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucagon receptor agonist — at doses up to 16 mg in adults with overweight or obesity but without diabetes. Thirty-two participants received once-weekly subcutaneous injections of mazdutide (n=24, split across two dose-escalation cohorts) or placebo (n=8) for 20 weeks. The study found that both mazdutide cohorts experienced substantially greater mean percent reductions in body weight from baseline (approximately -20% and -21%, respectively) compared to the placebo group (approximately -0.1%), with statistically significant differences. The authors also reported improvements in metabolic markers and concluded that the 16 mg dose was well tolerated. Key limitations include the small sample size (particularly the placebo group of only 8 participants), the short 20-week duration, the Phase 1 design which is primarily safety-focused, and the absence of participants with diabetes, limiting generalizability. These findings suggest a dose-response relationship at higher doses than previously studied, but larger and longer trials are needed to confirm these results.
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · Aug 2025DOI ↗ Review
This editorial provides a narrative overview of the rapidly escalating global obesity crisis and the evolving landscape of pharmacological treatments, with a focus on GLP-1 receptor agonists such as oral semaglutide. Drawing on the World Obesity Atlas 2025, the authors highlight that the number of adults living with obesity is projected to more than double—from 524 million in 2010 to 1.13 billion by 2030. The editorial notes that the global market for weight-loss medications has been revised upward to $150 billion by 2035, reflecting explosive growth in demand. The authors discuss the FDA's acceptance of a new drug application for oral semaglutide, potentially the first oral agent approved for long-term weight management. Key concerns raised include the limited long-term and real-world safety and efficacy data for GLP-1 receptor agonists, challenges with treatment adherence, and the proliferation of unregulated compounded ("copycat") versions of these drugs that lack quality and safety evaluation. As an editorial, this piece synthesizes publicly available data and regulatory updates rather than presenting original research, and it does not conduct systematic literature searches or meta-analyses. Its conclusions are opinion-based and should be interpreted accordingly.
Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · Aug 2025DOI ↗ Review
This evidence review examines the evolving landscape of incretin-based pharmacotherapy, focusing on GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and newer multi-receptor co-agonists for cardiometabolic disease management. The paper surveys established GLP-1RAs — including liraglutide, dulaglutide, albiglutide, exenatide, and semaglutide — noting their reported benefits on glycated hemoglobin, body weight, lipid profiles, liver fat, and cardiovascular outcomes (reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events, or MACE). It also covers emerging agents: dual GIP/GLP-1 agonist tirzepatide (approved for diabetes and obesity), dual GLP-1/glucagon co-agonists (notable for synergistic weight loss), and triple GLP-1/GIP/glucagon receptor agonists such as retatrutide and efocipegtrutide, described as achieving the highest pharmacotherapy-associated weight loss observed to date. Additional novel classes reviewed include GLP-1/amylin agonists (CagriSema, Amycretin), non-semaglutide oral GLP-1 agents, and peptide YY/GLP-1 dual agonists. As a narrative review, the paper does not present original trial data, and its conclusions are based on synthesized existing literature, which may introduce selection bias. The authors anticipate that metabolic benefits will translate into cardiometabolic outcomes, though direct evidence for many newer agents remains limited.
World journal of cardiology · Aug 2025DOI ↗ Review
This review examines the rationale and emerging clinical evidence for triple receptor agonist therapies targeting GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon receptors as next-generation treatments for obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D). The authors focus primarily on retatrutide, the most clinically advanced triple agonist, which has completed Phase 2 trials. In people with obesity, retatrutide achieved up to 24.2% mean weight loss over 48 weeks; in people with T2D, it produced 16.9% mean weight loss over 36 weeks, alongside a 2.2% reduction in HbA1c and 82% of participants reaching HbA1c ≤ 6.5%. The review also highlights improvements in blood pressure, lipid profiles, waist circumference, and liver fat (82% reduction in hepatic steatosis). Gastrointestinal side effects were the most commonly reported adverse events, with no major safety signals identified in Phase 2. The authors also briefly discuss other unimolecular triple agonists and combination regimens in development. Key limitations include that this is a narrative review of Phase 2 data; Phase 3 confirmatory trials are still ongoing. Conclusions about long-term efficacy, safety, and cardiovascular/renal outcomes remain premature pending those results.
Current cardiovascular risk reports · Jul 2025DOI ↗ Review
This review article, published as part of a special issue on GLP-1 receptor agonists, examines the emerging class of glucagon receptor (GCGR)-based multi-agonist drugs as pharmacological treatments for obesity. The authors discuss several investigational agents — mazdutide, pemvidutide, survodutide, and retatrutide — all of which are in advanced stages of clinical development. According to the review, early-phase trial data for these agents suggest they can produce significant weight loss, potentially exceeding that seen with currently available therapies. The article also highlights their potential to address obesity-related comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and notes that some agents are being evaluated in cardiovascular outcomes trials. The authors position GCGR-based multi-agonists as potentially important additions to future obesity treatment guidelines, particularly for patients who have not responded adequately to existing medications or lifestyle interventions. Key limitations and considerations noted include cost, access, and the need for long-term safety data as these drugs progress toward regulatory approval. As a narrative review, this article synthesizes existing trial data but does not generate new primary evidence.
Drugs in context · Jul 2025DOI ↗ Animal only
This preclinical study investigated whether three GLP-1-based receptor agonists — semaglutide (GLP-1 receptor agonist), tirzepatide (dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist), and retatrutide (triple GIP/GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonist) — could alter the interoceptive (subjective-like) effects of alcohol in rats. Using an operant drug discrimination paradigm in both male and female rats, researchers trained animals to distinguish alcohol from vehicle, then tested whether these compounds disrupted that learned discrimination. The study found that acute administration of all three agents attenuated alcohol's discriminative stimulus effects, suggesting modulation of how alcohol "feels" internally. Repeated semaglutide treatment maintained this effect over a 15-day period, and the effect reversed within three days of cessation. The authors suggest these findings may help explain clinically observed reductions in alcohol craving and drinking in humans receiving GLP-1 receptor agonists. Limitations include the exclusive use of animal models, meaning direct translation to human subjective alcohol experience remains uncertain, and the study does not assess long-term outcomes or dependence-related endpoints.
Psychopharmacology · Jul 2025DOI ↗ Strong · human
This Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) synthesized evidence from 19 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling 29,506 adults with overweight or obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²) to compare the weight-loss efficacy and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists (liraglutide, semaglutide), dual agonists (tirzepatide, survodutide), and the triple agonist retatrutide against placebo over at least 36 weeks. The study found that retatrutide and dual agonists achieved equivalent mean weight loss (approximately −11.0 kg), both outperforming GLP-1 receptor agonists (approximately −9.0 kg). Retatrutide showed the highest odds of achieving ≥15% weight loss (OR 54.6), followed by dual agonists (OR 16.4) and GLP-1 receptor agonists (OR 9.0). However, retatrutide was also associated with the highest adverse event risk. Meta-regression analyses indicated that type 2 diabetes mellitus attenuated weight loss across all drug classes, while female-dominant and higher-BMI cohorts showed enhanced outcomes. Limitations include indirect comparisons inherent to NMA methodology, heterogeneity across trials in baseline characteristics, and the fact that retatrutide data remain from earlier-phase trials. The authors recommend individualized treatment selection based on patient-specific factors.
Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · Jul 2025DOI ↗ Review
This narrative review examines how rapidly advancing obesity pharmacotherapies — particularly GLP-1 receptor agonists, dual and triple incretin agonists, and amylin-based combination therapies — are challenging the longstanding criteria used to determine eligibility for bariatric surgery. The authors note that current surgical guidelines were established when effective medical alternatives were limited, and argue that newer agents achieving 15–25% body weight reduction now approach outcomes historically associated only with surgery. The review compares surgical and pharmacologic interventions across dimensions of efficacy, safety, metabolic benefit, and cost-effectiveness, and considers whether a stepwise, pharmacotherapy-first approach may be appropriate — particularly for individuals with a BMI of 30–40 kg/m². The authors also discuss potential roles for pharmacotherapy in perioperative care and long-term obesity management, and call for personalized treatment strategies. As a narrative review, the paper does not conduct a systematic search or meta-analysis, which limits its ability to make definitive comparative claims. It reflects the authors' interpretive synthesis of existing literature rather than new primary data, and is subject to selection bias inherent to the narrative format.
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · Jul 2025DOI ↗ Animal only
This study investigated the mechanisms underlying weight loss produced by CagriSema — a combination of cagrilintide (an amylin analogue) and semaglutide (a GLP-1 analogue) — in a rat model. Researchers quantified the contributions of reduced energy intake versus preserved energy expenditure to overall weight loss. Rats treated with CagriSema achieved approximately 12% body weight loss alongside a 39% reduction in food intake. To isolate the role of energy intake, the authors used two comparison conditions: pair-feeding (matching food intake to CagriSema-treated animals) and weight matching (determining how much food restriction alone would be needed to achieve equivalent weight loss, which required a 51% reduction in intake). The gap between these conditions suggested that roughly one-third of CagriSema's weight loss effect was attributable to blunting of metabolic adaptation — the phenomenon where the body typically reduces energy expenditure in response to caloric restriction. Limitations include that findings are from an animal model and may not directly translate to humans, and the study does not address long-term outcomes. The authors conclude that CagriSema's dual action on both energy intake and expenditure may contribute to its potential effectiveness as an obesity treatment.
Nature metabolism · Jul 2025DOI ↗ Review
This review paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current and emerging pharmacological landscape for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), the progressive inflammatory form of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). The authors describe MASH as a growing global health burden, closely tied to obesity and type 2 diabetes, and carrying significant risks of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver failure. The review synthesizes evidence from advanced-stage clinical trials evaluating several therapeutic classes, including incretin-based therapies (GLP-1 receptor agonists, dual, and triple agonists such as semaglutide, tirzepatide, and survodutide), metabolic modulators (PPAR agonists like lanifibranor, FGF21 analogues like pegozafermin, and thyroid hormone receptor-beta agonists like resmetirom), and novel agents such as fatty acid synthase inhibitors. The authors note that regulatory endpoints currently rely on histological assessment, while noninvasive biomarkers and personalized approaches are gaining traction. Genetic factors, such as PNPLA3 polymorphisms, and artificial intelligence are highlighted as emerging tools for patient stratification and trial design. Key limitations acknowledged include unresolved questions about treatment duration, response heterogeneity, long-term adherence, and the evolving definition of therapeutic success.
The Journal of clinical investigation · Jul 2025DOI ↗ Limited · human
This retrospective observational study used the TriNetX database of de-identified electronic health records (January 2018–December 2020) to compare cardiovascular outcomes between semaglutide and dulaglutide in adults with type 2 diabetes. From a pool of nearly 4.7 million patients with type 2 diabetes, 231,075 semaglutide initiators and 189,103 dulaglutide initiators were identified. Propensity score matching yielded 171,105 patients per group. Over a 3-year follow-up, the study found that semaglutide was associated with statistically significantly lower rates of all-cause death (4.2% vs. 5.6%; HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.72–0.78), acute myocardial infarction (5.2% vs. 5.6%; HR 0.94), stroke (5.8% vs. 6.4%; HR 0.90), and acute heart failure hospitalization (5.3% vs. 6.1%; HR 0.88) compared with dulaglutide. Key limitations include the observational, non-randomized design, which is susceptible to residual confounding despite propensity score matching; reliance on administrative/EHR coding for outcome ascertainment; and the inability to distinguish between semaglutide formulations (oral vs. injectable) or account for dosing differences between agents.
Scientific reports · Jul 2025DOI ↗ Review
This review paper examines whether two major antihyperglycemic drug classes — sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) — may have a therapeutic role in gout management, particularly in patients who also have type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The authors describe gout as the most common form of inflammatory arthritis, driven by hyperuricemia that leads to monosodium urate crystal deposition in joints and tissues. The review summarizes evidence from multiple clinical studies suggesting that SGLT2 inhibitors lower serum urate (SU) levels, likely by promoting urinary uric acid excretion, which could benefit gout patients with comorbid T2DM. The paper also notes that SGLT2 inhibitors have demonstrated reductions in cardiovascular and renal events. By contrast, the effect of GLP-1 RAs on SU levels and urinary uric acid excretion in humans is described as unclear. The authors review mechanisms of action, structure-activity relationships, uricosuric effects, pharmacokinetic profiles, and adverse effects for both drug classes. Key limitations include the review design, reliance on studies conducted primarily in T2DM populations, and the absence of dedicated gout-specific clinical trials for either drug class.
Pharmaceutics · Jun 2025DOI ↗ Animal only
This preclinical study investigated whether mazdutide — a dual glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) and glucagon receptor (GCGR) agonist — could improve cognition in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Male db/db mice (a well-established T2DM model characterized by obesity and hyperglycemia) were treated with mazdutide and compared against dulaglutide, a GLP-1R-only agonist. Researchers assessed cognitive function via behavioral tests and examined brain pathology for neurodegenerative markers. They also applied transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic (multi-omics) analyses to explore underlying molecular mechanisms. The study found that mazdutide-treated mice showed greater improvements in cognitive performance compared to dulaglutide-treated mice, along with better neuronal structure and brain tissue integrity. Multi-omics data implicated molecular pathways related to neuroprotection, energy metabolism, and synaptic plasticity as potential contributors to these effects. Key limitations include exclusive use of male mice, meaning results cannot be generalized to females, and the entirely preclinical nature of the study. No human data were collected, so whether these findings translate to people with T2DM remains unknown. The authors suggest mazdutide may warrant further investigation as a treatment for metabolic disorder-associated cognitive decline.
EBioMedicine · Jun 2025DOI ↗ Moderate · human
This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated the comparative efficacy and safety of dual and triple incretin-based agonists — compounds targeting combinations of GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon receptors — versus standard therapies for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Researchers searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase through July 2024, identifying randomized controlled trials assessing outcomes including body weight, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose (FBG), adverse events (AEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs). The analysis found that Retatrutide (a triple agonist) was associated with the greatest weight reduction, while Tirzepatide (a dual GLP-1/GIP agonist) showed the largest reductions in both FBG and HbA1c. Regarding safety, Tirzepatide and Cotadutide were associated with increased AEs, whereas Semaglutide was associated with reduced SAEs. The authors suggest that receptor-specific targeting may help personalize T2DM treatment. Key limitations include small sample sizes in some included trials, short study durations, and reliance on indirect comparisons in the network meta-analysis. The authors acknowledge that direct head-to-head trials are needed to confirm these findings. The study was prospectively registered (PROSPERO: CRD42024532368).
Acta diabetologica · Jun 2025DOI ↗