Strong · human
This living systematic review and network meta-analysis, commissioned by the American College of Physicians, synthesized evidence from 69 randomized controlled trials involving 112,511 adults with overweight or obesity (BMI ≥25 kg/m²) to compare pharmacologic weight-management treatments. Drugs examined included GLP-1 receptor agonists (semaglutide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide, lixisenatide), dual agonists (tirzepatide, retatrutide, semaglutide-cagrilintide), and other agents (naltrexone-bupropion, phentermine, phentermine-topiramate, orforglipron), with or without lifestyle intervention. The review found that nearly all studied interventions produced greater weight loss than placebo and/or lifestyle intervention alone. Semaglutide was found to probably reduce mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Semaglutide and tirzepatide demonstrated the greatest weight loss in both pairwise and network meta-analyses. However, nearly all active treatments were also associated with more treatment discontinuations due to adverse events compared with placebo. The authors noted that evidence for critical outcomes such as mortality, MACE, and serious adverse events remained limited, and direct head-to-head comparisons between treatments were scarce. Thirty-seven of the 69 included studies were rated at low risk of bias. The living review design allows for ongoing evidence updates as new trials emerge.
Annals of internal medicine · Jun 2026DOI ↗ Strong · human
The REIMAGINE 2 trial was a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo- and active-controlled study evaluating the fixed-dose combination of cagrilintide (an amylin receptor agonist) and semaglutide (a GLP-1 receptor agonist), known as CagriSema, in 2,713 adults with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes and overweight or obesity across 30 countries. Participants were on background metformin with or without an SGLT2 inhibitor and were followed for 68 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline. The study found that the higher-dose CagriSema combination produced a statistically significantly greater reduction in HbA1c compared with semaglutide alone (-1.91 vs. -1.75 percentage points; treatment difference -0.16 percentage points; p=0.0035). Adverse events were more frequent in the combination group (86.9%) than in the semaglutide monotherapy group (81.2%), with gastrointestinal disorders being the most common across active treatment arms. Limitations include the relatively modest absolute difference in HbA1c reduction, a predominantly White study population, and industry funding by Novo Nordisk, which may introduce sponsorship bias.
The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · Jun 2026DOI ↗ Strong · human
The REIMAGINE 3 trial investigated the combination of cagrilintide and semaglutide (CagriSema) as a weekly add-on to daily basal insulin in adults with type 2 diabetes and suboptimal glycaemic control (HbA1c 7.0–10.5%). In this 40-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study conducted across 46 centres in six countries, 274 participants were randomised to one of two active dose combinations (2.4 mg each or 1.0 mg each) or pooled placebo. The primary endpoint—change in HbA1c from baseline to week 40—was significantly greater with both CagriSema doses (–2.33% and –2.10%, respectively) compared with placebo (–0.66%). Both active groups also achieved substantial bodyweight reductions versus placebo, and no additional hypoglycaemia risk was observed. The safety profile was consistent with the GLP-1 receptor agonist class. Limitations include a relatively short 40-week duration, a moderately sized sample, and industry funding by Novo Nordisk. The study authors conclude that CagriSema meaningfully improved glycaemic control when added to basal insulin, without increasing hypoglycaemia risk.
Lancet (London, England) · Jun 2026DOI ↗ Strong · human
This systematic review and meta-analysis pooled data from four randomized controlled trials (n = 5,023 adults with overweight or obesity) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cagrilintide — a long-acting amylin analogue — and its combination with semaglutide (CagriSema) versus placebo. The primary outcome was percent change in body weight. The authors followed PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR 2 guidelines and used Cochrane RoB 2 for bias assessment, with random-effects models throughout. Key findings: cagrilintide alone was associated with a mean body weight reduction of approximately 6.1% versus placebo (95% CI: −8.0% to −4.1%), and CagriSema with approximately 6.0% (95% CI: −10.6% to −1.3%). CagriSema also significantly reduced waist circumference and HbA1c; cagrilintide alone showed modest blood pressure improvements without significant glycemic effects. Adverse events were more frequent with active treatment, though discontinuation rates were comparable to placebo. Notable limitations include the small number of pooled trials (n = 4) and potential heterogeneity across study populations and durations. The authors conclude that both therapies show clinically meaningful weight loss and acceptable tolerability, positioning them as emerging options in obesity pharmacotherapy.
Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · May 2026DOI ↗ Strong · human
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of CagriSema — a dual therapy combining the GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide with the amylin analogue cagrilintide — compared to semaglutide monotherapy or placebo in adults with obesity. The authors searched four major databases through July 2025 and identified four eligible randomized controlled trials encompassing 4,419 participants (CagriSema: 3,055; controls: 1,364). Pooled analyses found that CagriSema was associated with significantly greater percent body weight loss (Cohen's d: −1.38; 95% CI: −1.84 to −0.91), greater absolute weight reduction (mean difference: −11 kg), reductions in waist circumference (−9.41 cm), and lower systolic blood pressure (−7.06 mmHg) versus comparators. However, gastrointestinal adverse events occurred more frequently with CagriSema (relative risk: 1.32). Notable limitations include high statistical heterogeneity (I² = 94.8%) across the included trials, the small number of studies (n = 4), and the absence of long-term safety and cardiovascular outcomes data. The authors conclude that CagriSema demonstrates superior weight reduction compared with semaglutide or placebo, but that tolerability monitoring and longer-term evidence are warranted.
The American journal of cardiology · Feb 2026DOI ↗