Review
This narrative review examines the pharmacological mechanisms, safety profiles, and regulatory status of twelve peptides commonly marketed in sports medicine contexts, spanning both FDA-approved compounds (e.g., tesamorelin/Egrifta) and unapproved "gray market" substances (e.g., BPC-157, CJC-1295, TB-500, ipamorelin, and others). The authors note that while many unapproved peptides show promising tissue repair and metabolic effects in animal models, rigorous human safety and efficacy data are largely absent. The review highlights a growing direct-to-consumer gray market operating outside regulatory oversight and discusses the potential for serious patient harm. Notably, the authors address the placebo effect as a possible mediator of perceived peptide efficacy and examine how social media may amplify this effect. A clinician-oriented framework is proposed to guide evidence-based patient discussions about peptide use for musculoskeletal healing and athletic performance, including consideration of alternative treatments. Key limitations include the narrative (non-systematic) review methodology and the inherently limited and heterogeneous evidence base for most compounds discussed, particularly in human populations.
Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · Apr 2026DOI ↗ ReviewPreprint
This narrative review examines the pharmacological mechanisms, safety profiles, and regulatory status of twelve peptides commonly encountered in sports medicine and athletic performance contexts, including both approved agents (e.g., tesamorelin/Egrifta, sermorelin) and unapproved "gray market" compounds (e.g., BPC-157, CJC-1295, TB-500, ipamorelin, AOD-9604, FS-344, GHK-Cu, MOTS-C, SS-31, and thymosin beta-4). The authors note that while many unapproved peptides show promising tissue repair and metabolic outcomes in animal models, rigorous human safety and efficacy data remain scarce. The review highlights the emergence of a direct-to-consumer gray market operating outside regulatory oversight and the potential for serious patient harm. It further discusses the placebo effect as a potential mediator of perceived peptide efficacy, and how social media may amplify this effect. The authors provide a clinical framework to guide patient-provider discussions and promote evidence-based practice for musculoskeletal healing. Key limitations include the narrative (non-systematic) review design, reliance on preclinical literature for most unapproved compounds, and the absence of head-to-head human trials for the majority of agents discussed.
Unknown journal · Apr 2026DOI ↗ Review
This critical review examines the emerging use of peptides and peptide analogues as performance-enhancing drugs in both competitive sport and recreational bodybuilding. The authors survey a range of compounds — including growth hormone secretagogues (e.g., Ipamorelin), growth hormone-releasing hormone analogues (e.g., CJC-1295, Sermorelin), and synthetic peptide fragments (e.g., Frag 176-191, KPV) — which are promoted in bodybuilding communities for purported benefits in muscle growth, fat loss, recovery, and anti-inflammation. The review notes that these compounds are attractive partly due to their enhanced receptor selectivity and stability compared to older anabolic agents. However, the authors conclude that clinical evidence supporting their use in sport contexts is limited; most existing research addresses therapeutic applications under controlled medical settings, not the high-dose or stacked protocols typical in bodybuilding. The review identifies potential risks including cardiovascular strain, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and psychiatric instability. It also highlights the dangers posed by an unregulated supply chain prone to mislabeling and contamination. Anti-doping detection remains challenging due to peptides' structural similarity to endogenous hormones and short half-lives. A key gap identified is the near-complete absence of population-level prevalence data, particularly for recreational users. The authors characterize peptide use in sport as high-risk and ethically problematic pending longitudinal safety evidence.
The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness · Mar 2026DOI ↗ Review
This narrative review examines the potential role of therapeutic peptides in orthopaedic care, synthesizing preclinical and mechanistic literature across several peptide classes. The authors categorize peptides by their primary proposed function: wound-healing agents (BPC-157, TB-500, GHK-Cu), growth hormone secretagogues (ipamorelin, CJC-1295, tesamorelin, sermorelin, AOD-9604), recovery-enhancing peptides (epithalon, delta sleep-inducing peptide, pinealon), and neuroactive peptides (selank, semax, dihexa). The review describes how these compounds are theorized to interact with signaling pathways—including PI3K/Akt, mTOR, MAPK, TGF-β, and AMPK—to promote tissue regeneration, resolve inflammation, and support neuromuscular recovery. The authors acknowledge that, while preclinical evidence is promising, robust human clinical trial data are largely absent, representing a significant gap in the literature. Limitations include the review's reliance on animal and in vitro studies, the absence of a systematic search methodology, and the lack of direct clinical evidence supporting efficacy or safety in human orthopaedic populations. The authors call for future controlled trials to validate these mechanistic findings in clinical settings.
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · Jan 2026DOI ↗ ReviewPreprint
This review paper examines the pharmacological mechanisms, safety profiles, and regulatory status of both approved and unapproved peptide therapies relevant to sports medicine, musculoskeletal injury recovery, and athletic performance enhancement. The compounds reviewed span a wide spectrum — from FDA-approved agents such as tesamorelin and sermorelin, to gray-market compounds including BPC-157, TB-500, CJC-1295, Ipamorelin, AOD-9604, FS-344, GHK-Cu, MOTS-C, and SS-31. The authors note that while many unapproved peptides show promising results in preclinical and animal models — including favorable tissue repair and metabolic effects — rigorous human safety and efficacy data remain scarce. The review highlights a growing direct-to-consumer gray market operating outside regulatory oversight and discusses how social media may amplify perceived benefits through placebo-related mechanisms. The paper also offers a clinical framework to guide patient conversations and support evidence-based decision-making. Key limitations include the inherent constraints of a narrative review design, reliance on heterogeneous preclinical data for unapproved compounds, and the absence of controlled human trials for most of the highlighted peptides.
Unknown journal · Dec 2025DOI ↗ Review
This narrative review examines the potential adjunctive role of growth hormone secretagogues (GHS) in managing body composition changes associated with male hypogonadism and metabolic syndrome. The authors acknowledge that while testosterone replacement therapy remains the standard of care for hypogonadism, its body composition benefits are inconsistent across patient populations. The review surveys existing literature on five GHS compounds — sermorelin, GHRP-2, GHRP-6, ibutamoren (MK-677), and ipamorelin — noting that all stimulate growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) secretion and may improve body composition metrics such as reducing fat mass and attenuating muscle atrophy. The authors also explore their potential utility in eugonadal males with metabolic syndrome or subclinical hypogonadism. A major limitation explicitly acknowledged by the authors is the scarcity of robust clinical trial data evaluating these compounds specifically in hypogonadal men. The review concludes that while GHS show theoretical and preliminary promise as complementary agents, the current evidence base is insufficient to draw firm clinical conclusions, and the authors call for future controlled investigations. No new primary data are presented.
Translational andrology and urology · Mar 2020DOI ↗