Review
This paper argues that body image has been largely overlooked in research on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1s) such as semaglutide and tirzepatide, despite its central relevance to why people seek these treatments and how they psychologically adjust to the bodily changes that follow. Drawing on existing literature across body image, weight loss interventions, weight stigma, and cosmetic procedures, the authors conceptualise body image not simply as an outcome of GLP-1 use, but as a motivator, mediator, and moderator across the entire treatment trajectory. The paper identifies several critical research gaps, including the absence of prospective and longitudinal studies tracking body image before, during, and after GLP-1 use, as well as limited understanding of individual vulnerability factors and heterogeneity in psychological responses. The authors also highlight broader societal concerns, including the potential reinforcement of weight stigma, inequities in access to these medications, and the role of media representation. They call for body image-informed psychological support for people using GLP-1s, as well as professional education and training. As a narrative review, the paper does not present new empirical data and its conclusions are based on inference from adjacent literatures rather than direct evidence.
Body image · Apr 2026DOI ↗ Review
This narrative review compared tirzepatide (a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist) and semaglutide (a selective GLP-1 receptor agonist) across weight loss, glycemic control, cardiometabolic, and safety outcomes by synthesizing evidence from clinical trials, real-world observational studies, and cardiovascular outcome analyses. The authors found that in completed head-to-head randomized trials, tirzepatide consistently produced greater reductions in body weight and HbA1c compared with semaglutide in people with obesity or type 2 diabetes. Regarding cardiovascular outcomes, the review noted that semaglutide currently holds the most mature evidence for cardiovascular risk reduction, supported by the SUSTAIN-6, PIONEER-6, and SELECT trials. Tirzepatide's SURPASS-CVOT trial demonstrated non-inferiority to dulaglutide for cardiovascular outcomes along with improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors, but direct cardiovascular superiority data versus semaglutide remain limited. Real-world studies on cardiovascular outcomes were characterized as heterogeneous. The authors concluded that treatment selection should be individualized. Key limitations include the narrative (non-systematic) methodology, potential for selection bias in literature inclusion, and the absence of a completed direct head-to-head cardiovascular outcomes trial between the two agents.
Frontiers in medicine · Apr 2026DOI ↗ Review
This systematic review (PRISMA-compliant, PROSPERO-registered) examined the association between GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and hair loss by searching four major databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science). Of 133 studies identified, 24 met inclusion criteria as primary articles. The review found that semaglutide and tirzepatide showed the highest reported incidence of hair loss and the strongest pharmacovigilance signals among GLP-1 RAs. The predominant subtypes reported were androgenetic alopecia and telogen effluvium, with telogen effluvium most frequently linked to tirzepatide—the agent associated with the greatest magnitude of weight loss. The authors noted that hair loss with semaglutide appeared dose-dependent, and that females were disproportionately affected. Rapid weight loss was identified as a potential contributing mechanism, especially for telogen effluvium. Other agents—liraglutide, dulaglutide, lixisenatide, and exenatide—had fewer studies and generally lower reported risk. Key limitations include the reliance on pharmacovigilance data and heterogeneous study designs, which preclude definitive causal conclusions. The authors call for large, prospective randomized trials to establish causality and temporal relationships.
Science progress · Apr 2026DOI ↗ Review
This review examines the current clinical development pipeline for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and its more advanced form, MASH (metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis), with a particular focus on cardiovascular comorbidities. The authors highlight the strong bidirectional relationship between MASLD and cardiometabolic risk, arguing that effective treatments should address both hepatic and cardiovascular outcomes simultaneously. The review surveys a broad range of drug candidates and mechanisms, including incretin mimetics (e.g., semaglutide), thyroid hormone receptor-beta agonists (e.g., resmetirom), farnesoid X receptor agonists, PPAR agonists, de novo lipogenesis inhibitors, and fibroblast growth factor analogues. The authors note that the two FDA-approved therapies — resmetirom and semaglutide — have demonstrated reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality in MASH patients, with semaglutide also showing benefit in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. However, the review emphasizes that cardiovascular outcome data for most other pipeline agents remain limited or absent. A key limitation is that this is a narrative review and does not involve primary data collection or meta-analytic methods.
Biomedicines · Apr 2026DOI ↗ Review
This systematic review, conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, synthesized evidence from 15 studies evaluating GLP-1 receptor agonist and dual incretin-based pharmacotherapies for obesity management, including semaglutide, liraglutide, tirzepatide, dulaglutide, and dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonists. Study participants were predominantly female (up to 79.3%), ranging in mean age from 22.4 to 59.8 years, with BMIs between 29.3 and 43.0 kg/m², and frequent comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular disease. The review found that weight loss was dose-dependent across agents, with dual GIP/GLP-1 therapy showing the greatest reductions. Cardiometabolic outcomes included reductions in HbA1c, systolic blood pressure, and LDL cholesterol across therapies. Gastrointestinal adverse events — particularly nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea — were commonly reported but generally mild, while serious events such as pancreatitis and gallbladder complications were rare. Treatment discontinuation rates were described as generally low. Limitations include the heterogeneity of included studies, variability in populations, and the review's reliance on previously published trial data rather than original participant-level analysis.
Disease-a-month : DM · Apr 2026DOI ↗ Review
This review paper examines the emerging evidence for glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) — specifically liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide — as potential interventions in prediabetes. The authors synthesize findings showing that GLP-1RAs were associated with reduced progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with normoglycaemia achieved in a notable proportion of subjects (up to 66%, 81%, and 93.3% for liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide, respectively). However, these glycaemic benefits were only partially maintained after drug discontinuation. The review also highlights modest reductions in HbA1c, fasting glucose, body weight, and fat mass, alongside improvements in insulin sensitivity and β-cell function. Potential cardiovascular benefits — including reduced risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and heart failure — were noted, particularly with tirzepatide. Experimental data suggested possible benefits for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). The safety profile was described as acceptable, with mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal effects being the most commonly reported adverse events. The authors acknowledge that the current evidence base is limited and call for large, well-designed randomised controlled trials to define the precise role of GLP-1RAs in prediabetes management.
Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · Apr 2026DOI ↗ Review
This narrative review synthesizes evidence on how GLP-1-based therapies (liraglutide, semaglutide, tirzepatide, dulaglutide, exenatide) interact with the gut microbiome and influence metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD/MASH) in the context of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The authors searched PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov (2015–2026), ultimately including 33 studies (18 preclinical, 15 clinical) out of 363 identified. Preclinical findings suggest liraglutide normalized the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio and increased beneficial bacteria, while tirzepatide reduced hepatic steatosis and increased Akkermansia abundance in diabetic mice, and semaglutide improved gut barrier integrity in murine models. Clinically, tirzepatide achieved MASH resolution in 44–62% of patients in the phase 2 SYNERGY-NASH trial, and the FDA approved semaglutide for MASH with fibrosis in August 2025 based on the Phase 3 ESSENCE trial. A longitudinal study found baseline microbiome composition predicted glycemic response to semaglutide. Key limitations include the narrative (non-systematic) design, heavy reliance on preclinical data, and heterogeneous study populations. The authors conclude that personalized MASLD management informed by microbiome profiling warrants further dedicated clinical investigation.
Biomedicines · Apr 2026DOI ↗ Review
This narrative review synthesizes evidence from randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and observational studies through 2026 to examine the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and dual incretin-based therapies on a range of ocular outcomes. The authors report that recent meta-analyses indicate an overall neutral long-term risk profile for diabetic retinopathy and macular edema with these agents. They describe a transient early worsening of diabetic retinopathy observed primarily in patients with advanced baseline disease undergoing rapid HbA1c reduction, framing this as a "metabolic transition phenomenon" rather than direct retinal toxicity—an interpretation supported by data from the SELECT trial, in which no increased ocular risk was found in a non-diabetic population. The review also notes observational signals suggesting possible protective associations with glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration, a potential safety concern regarding nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy at low absolute incidence, and emerging evidence of benefit in ocular surface homeostasis and uveitis. Limitations include reliance on observational data for several signals and the inherent constraints of a narrative review design. The authors conclude that risk-stratified ophthalmic monitoring, aligned with a cited 2025 expert consensus, is preferable to routine treatment avoidance in high-risk diabetic patients.
Journal of obesity & metabolic syndrome · Apr 2026DOI ↗ Review
This narrative review synthesizes the evolution of incretin-based pharmacotherapies for metabolic disorders, drawing on literature from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar up to July 2025. The authors trace the trajectory from DPP-4 inhibitors—noted for modest glycaemic benefits—through GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) such as liraglutide and semaglutide, which pivotal trials have associated with meaningful weight loss and cardiometabolic protection, to next-generation agents. Dual GIP/GLP-1 agonist tirzepatide and triple agonist retatrutide are highlighted as demonstrating particularly substantial efficacy, with the review citing up to 24% body weight reduction alongside improvements in hepatic and inflammatory markers in included trials. Agents such as cotadutide and efinopegdutide are discussed in the context of expanding indications to MASLD and MASH. The authors acknowledge several limitations across the field: high cost and accessibility barriers, underrepresentation of low- and middle-income country populations in major trials, and pharmacogenomic variability that may modify therapeutic response. As a review, this paper does not generate new primary data. Its conclusions depend on the quality and representativeness of the underlying trials it synthesizes, and no independent meta-analytic pooling appears to have been conducted.
The Indian journal of medical research · Apr 2026DOI ↗ Review
This review examines the global burden of pediatric obesity and its cardiovascular consequences, drawing on data from PubMed, Scopus, and Springer databases. The authors report that over 381 million children worldwide are affected by obesity, and that childhood obesity substantially increases the risk of adult obesity and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) including atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease, hypertension, dysglycemia, dyslipidemia, arrhythmias, and stroke. The study identifies both genetic contributors (highlighted by genome-wide association studies) and lifestyle drivers such as physical inactivity, prolonged screen time, and poor diet. The authors evaluate public health frameworks including the WHO Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018–2030, as well as management strategies spanning lifestyle modification, pharmacotherapy (notably GLP-1 receptor agonists semaglutide and liraglutide), and bariatric surgery. They highlight data from the SURMOUNT-5 trial on tirzepatide and discuss emerging investigational agents including cagrilintide/semaglutide combination, orforglipron, danuglipron, and retatrutide. Gene therapy is noted as experimental. A key limitation is that this is a narrative review without systematic methodology or original data collection, limiting causal inference.
Clinical nutrition ESPEN · Mar 2026DOI ↗ Review
This narrative review examines emerging pharmacological approaches for managing obesity in patients with cardiovascular disease, with a focus on novel anti-obesity agents beyond the already-established semaglutide and tirzepatide. The authors surveyed the current landscape of investigational weight-lowering drugs, categorizing them by their primary mechanisms of action: reducing caloric intake, increasing basal metabolic rate, and increasing muscle mass. The review highlights that GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have demonstrated both significant weight reduction and cardiovascular benefits, but notes a concern regarding muscle wasting associated with their use. The authors suggest that combination therapies using agents with complementary mechanisms may help mitigate this side effect. The review concludes that obesity treatment is likely to become more personalized over time and anticipates further cardiovascular benefits from pipeline agents. The authors also emphasize that the strongest evidence linking increased muscle mass and basal metabolic rate to improved cardiovascular health comes from diet and physical activity, positioning pharmacotherapy as a complement to—rather than a replacement for—healthy lifestyle changes. As a narrative review, this paper does not perform systematic synthesis or meta-analysis, and its conclusions reflect the authors' expert opinion rather than pooled quantitative data.
Biomedicines · Mar 2026DOI ↗ Review
This narrative review synthesized evidence on injectable semaglutide for weight management specifically in non-diabetic adults, drawing on 27 studies (including RCTs, observational studies, and qualitative reports) identified through PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2019–2025) using the SANRA framework. The authors found that, according to the included literature, semaglutide (2.4 mg) was associated with mean body weight reductions of approximately 14.9% in non-diabetic adults, compared to roughly 9.6% in diabetic populations. Beyond weight loss, the review reported improvements in cardiometabolic markers and quality-of-life measures. Gastrointestinal adverse effects were identified as the primary driver of treatment discontinuation. The review also highlighted practical barriers to real-world use, including high out-of-pocket costs, global supply constraints, and evidence of weight regain following cessation. Tirzepatide was used as a comparative benchmark. The authors conclude that semaglutide represents a meaningful advance in obesity pharmacotherapy but emphasize that its utility depends on integration into multimodal treatment strategies and resolution of structural access issues. Limitations include the narrative (non-systematic) design, potential for selection bias in study inclusion, and inability to pool effect sizes statistically.
Health science reports · Mar 2026DOI ↗ Review
This review synthesizes evidence for glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) as treatments for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and its more advanced form, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), with particular attention to the liver-heart connection. The authors draw on mechanistic studies, biopsy-based randomized trials, real-world data, and cardiovascular outcome trials. Key trial findings highlighted include: liraglutide (LEAN trial) achieving steatohepatitis resolution in 39% vs. 9% of placebo recipients; semaglutide showing dose-dependent histologic resolution (up to 59% vs. 17% in Phase 2) and meeting dual histologic endpoints in F2–F3 MASH at interim analysis; and tirzepatide (SYNERGY-NASH) demonstrating MASH resolution in 44–62% vs. 10% with fibrosis improvement signals. Cardiovascular outcome benefits were observed across LEADER, SUSTAIN-6, SELECT, and REWIND trials. Mechanistically, GLP-1RAs are described as reducing hepatic lipogenesis, inflammation, and insulin resistance while improving systemic cardiometabolic risk factors. The review concludes that semaglutide and tirzepatide may serve as foundational therapies for high-risk MASLD patients, while noting gaps in long-term durability data, optimal treatment duration, and evidence in cirrhosis.
Chronic diseases and translational medicine · Mar 2026DOI ↗ Review
This narrative review examines the evolving role of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in managing chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly in patients with type 2 diabetes, obesity, and established cardiovascular disease. The authors summarize evidence from cardiovascular outcomes trials showing that GLP-1RAs are associated with reduced albuminuria and slower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline, with effects that appear additive to those of SGLT2 inhibitors. They highlight dedicated kidney trials—notably with semaglutide—suggesting slowed CKD progression and reduced mortality in diabetic patients with CKD. The review situates GLP-1RAs within a broader therapeutic framework alongside ACE inhibitors/ARBs, SGLT2 inhibitors, and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. The authors acknowledge key evidence gaps, including limited data in non-diabetic CKD populations and uncertainty around oral GLP-1RA efficacy and newer dual/triple agonists (GLP-1/GIP/glucagon). As a review, it does not generate new primary data and is subject to potential selection bias in the literature it incorporates. The authors conclude that GLP-1-based therapies represent a potentially transformative approach to improving weight, cardiovascular, and kidney outcomes in high-risk populations.
International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · Mar 2026DOI ↗ Review
This narrative review compares two incretin-based therapies — semaglutide, a selective GLP-1 receptor agonist, and tirzepatide, a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist — across their mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, therapeutic indications, and cardiovascular/renal evidence. The authors describe semaglutide as having a well-established clinical profile with demonstrated benefits in glycaemic control, body weight reduction, and cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Tirzepatide is presented as a newer agent offering superior weight loss and improvements in insulin sensitivity, with an expanding range of therapeutic indications, though the authors note its cardiovascular outcomes evidence is less mature than that of semaglutide. The review emphasizes that despite shared benefits in reducing HbA1c and body weight, the two molecules differ meaningfully in their pharmacological mechanisms and evidence bases, requiring individualized clinical decision-making. The authors frame both agents within a broader "incretin revolution" relevant to cardio-reno-metabolic prevention. As a narrative review, this paper synthesizes existing literature rather than generating new primary data, and therefore does not provide independent experimental evidence to confirm or quantify any specific clinical claims.
European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · Mar 2026DOI ↗ Review
This review examines the landscape of next-generation glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-based therapeutics in clinical development for type 2 diabetes and obesity, building on the established success of semaglutide and tirzepatide. The authors survey a broad range of investigational agents that target multiple gastro-entero-pancreatic hormone receptors simultaneously — including GIP, glucagon, amylin, and peptide YY receptors — to produce synergistic effects on energy intake, storage, and expenditure. Specific agents discussed include maridebart cafraglutide (GLP-1 agonism/GIP antagonism), survodutide and mazdutide (GLP-1/glucagon coagonists), cagrilintide combined with semaglutide (CagriSema), amycretin (amylin/GLP-1 dual agent), and retatrutide (GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonist). The review also highlights the emergence of oral small-molecule GLP-1 receptor agonists such as danuglipron and orforglipron, which resist enzymatic degradation and may improve patient convenience. The paper does not present original clinical trial data; it synthesizes existing preclinical and clinical development evidence. As a narrative review, it does not meta-analytically pool outcomes, and the included agents are largely at Phase 1–3 stages, meaning long-term efficacy and safety data remain limited.
Endocrine reviews · Mar 2026DOI ↗ Review
This paper examines the ethical landscape surrounding semaglutide (marketed as Ozempic, Rybelsus, and Wegovy), a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist manufactured by Novo Nordisk and primarily used to treat type II diabetes. The authors note that semaglutide has garnered widespread attention beyond its diabetic indication due to its effects on appetite suppression and weight loss, earning it the popular label of a "miracle drug." The paper surveys a range of ethical concerns that have been raised in both governmental and public discourse — including issues around drug access and equity, medicalization of obesity, societal body-image pressures, and resource allocation — and critically analyzes whether these concerns are sufficient to advise against prescribing semaglutide for weight loss. The authors ultimately argue that, while many of the ethical objections raised are legitimate and deserve serious consideration, none individually or collectively constitute a conclusive reason to withhold semaglutide prescriptions for weight management purposes. As an ethics and policy review, the paper does not present original clinical trial data and offers no empirical findings on patient outcomes. Its conclusions are based on philosophical argument and literature synthesis rather than experimental evidence.
Journal of medical ethics · Feb 2026DOI ↗ Review
This review examines the development and clinical progress of long-acting amylin-related peptides as treatments for obesity and type 2 diabetes. It traces the field from the first-generation amylin receptor (AMYR) agonist pramlintide—which acts centrally to induce satiety, suppress glucagon, and reduce post-meal hyperglycemia but had limited use as an insulin adjunct—to a new generation of non-aggregating, long-acting analogues. The authors describe advances in understanding the heterodimeric structure of amylin-calcitonin receptor complexes that have guided the rational design of these newer agents. Highlighted compounds include the dual AMYR/calcitonin-receptor agonist cagrilintide, the combination product CagriSema (cagrilintide plus semaglutide), and the unimolecular tri-agonist amycretin. Several monotherapy candidates (eloralintide, petrelintide, Met-233, AZD6234) are also discussed. The review notes that gastrointestinal side effects—chiefly nausea—are common during initiation but typically resolve with continued use, and highlights emerging preclinical and early clinical signals for potential benefits in fatty liver disease, diabetic kidney disease, and resistant hypertension. As a narrative review, it synthesizes heterogeneous sources and does not itself generate new primary data.
Review
This Chinese clinical comprehensive evaluation systematically compared five long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists (dulaglutide, semaglutide, polyethylene glycol loxenatide, tirzepatide, and mazdutide) for the management of type 2 diabetes within China's healthcare context. The researchers constructed a quantitative, six-dimensional scoring framework—covering efficacy, safety, economy, innovation, suitability, and accessibility—with indicator weights derived through a Delphi expert consultation process. Evidence sources included drug labels, systematic literature reviews, and real-world data. Semaglutide scored highest (76.6/100) followed by dulaglutide (72.6), polyethylene glycol loxenatide (64.8), tirzepatide (62.9), and mazdutide (55.1). Semaglutide and dulaglutide were classified as "Strong Recommendations," largely due to superior cardio-renal outcome evidence. Tirzepatide and polyethylene glycol loxenatide received "Conditional Recommendations," while mazdutide was "Not Recommended" owing to insufficient evidence, lack of national reimbursement listing, and high cost. Key limitations include the inherent subjectivity of the Delphi weighting process, the China-specific formulary and reimbursement context limiting global generalizability, and the composite nature of the scoring system potentially obscuring individual domain differences.
Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · Feb 2026DOI ↗ Review
This narrative review examines three incretin-based therapies — liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide — approved for weight management in non-diabetic individuals with obesity. The authors provide background on the physiological roles of the incretin hormones GIP and GLP-1 in the gastrointestinal tract, explaining how pharmacological analogues of these hormones, initially developed for type 2 diabetes, were subsequently found to produce clinically meaningful weight reduction. The review compares the three agents across efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness, and real-world clinical trends. Lifestyle interventions (dietary modification, physical activity, sleep, and stress management) are discussed as foundational components of obesity management. The authors highlight that all three agents are now regulatory-approved for obesity in non-diabetic patients. As a narrative review, the paper synthesizes existing literature rather than generating new primary data, and is therefore subject to selection bias in the studies chosen. It does not conduct a formal systematic search or meta-analysis, limiting the objectivity of comparisons. No new clinical trial data are presented, and conclusions about relative efficacy and cost-effectiveness are drawn from the authors' interpretation of the existing evidence base.
Rambam Maimonides medical journal · Jan 2026DOI ↗