Review
This 2026 American College of Physicians (ACP) living clinical guideline synthesizes systematic reviews on pharmacologic treatments combined with lifestyle modifications for weight management in nonpregnant adults with overweight or obesity in outpatient settings, using the GRADE framework. For adults with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m²), the ACP issued conditional recommendations favoring semaglutide and tirzepatide as first-line agents (moderate-certainty evidence), phentermine-topiramate as second-line (low-certainty), liraglutide as third-line (low-certainty), and naltrexone-bupropion as fourth-line (low-certainty). For adults with overweight (BMI ≥27–30 kg/m²) who also have type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, or cardiovascular disease, the guideline conditionally recommends semaglutide and tirzepatide as first-line and liraglutide as second-line. All recommendations are conditional, reflecting the importance of shared decision-making around benefits, harms, costs, access, comorbidities, contraindications (e.g., cardiovascular contraindication and monthly pregnancy-test requirement for phentermine-topiramate; suicidal ideation risk with naltrexone-bupropion), and patient preferences. The living guideline format signals ongoing updates as new evidence emerges.
Annals of internal medicine · Jun 2026DOI ↗ Review
This systematic review, conducted for the American College of Physicians, evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pharmacologic treatments for overweight or obesity in U.S. adults. Researchers searched MEDLINE, Embase, and economic databases through October 2025, ultimately including 9 studies encompassing 42 pairwise treatment comparisons. Study quality was assessed using the CHEQUE tool, value was measured via incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) against established willingness-to-pay thresholds, and certainty of evidence was graded using GRADE. Key findings from the 6 moderate-certainty studies suggested that liraglutide had low value compared with lifestyle modification, while phentermine-topiramate and tirzepatide showed high value versus lifestyle modification. Semaglutide demonstrated low value compared with naltrexone-bupropion and phentermine-topiramate, but high value compared with liraglutide. Important limitations include that all 9 included studies were model-based rather than empirical trial-based analyses, only 4 of 9 were at low risk of bias, none of the 42 comparisons reached high certainty, and reporting was frequently incomplete. The authors conclude that current U.S. evidence on cost-effectiveness of obesity pharmacotherapy is significantly hampered by poor study quality, restricting the strength of any conclusions that can be drawn.
Annals of internal medicine · Jun 2026DOI ↗ Review
This systematic review examined existing evidence on the use of second-generation incretin analogs — specifically semaglutide (a GLP-1 receptor agonist) and tirzepatide (a dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist) — in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) or latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA). Researchers screened 3,053 records from six major databases and ClinicalTrials.gov, ultimately identifying 11 eligible publications. These comprised two systematic reviews, one post hoc subgroup analysis, six narrative or consensus reviews, and two LADA case reports. Three key themes emerged from the synthesis: (1) LADA is frequently misdiagnosed or diagnosis is delayed due to its heterogeneous presentation; (2) both tirzepatide and semaglutide show potential benefits in LADA and in certain T1D subtypes, particularly in individuals retaining residual beta-cell function; and (3) existing clinical management frameworks may guide practice while robust trial data are awaited. The authors concluded that current evidence is promising but moderate in quality, and that well-designed, adequately powered randomized controlled trials in clearly defined LADA and T1D populations are needed to establish long-term efficacy and safety. Notable limitations include the small number of eligible studies, the predominance of review-level and narrative publications, and only two primary patient-level reports.
Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners · Jun 2026DOI ↗ Review
This narrative review examines the continued clinical relevance of dulaglutide, a once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist, in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) amid growing adoption of newer incretin-based therapies such as semaglutide and tirzepatide. The authors synthesize evidence from major cardiovascular outcome trials, including the REWIND trial—which they highlight as the only GLP-1 receptor agonist trial to demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in a predominantly primary prevention population over more than five years—and the SURPASS-CVOT, which established tirzepatide's non-inferiority to dulaglutide for cardiovascular outcomes. The review acknowledges that semaglutide and tirzepatide show superior HbA1c reduction and weight loss compared to dulaglutide, but argues that dulaglutide's fixed-dose, no-titration regimen, established cardiovascular safety profile, real-world tolerability, and lower cost support its continued use—particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Limitations include the narrative (non-systematic) review design, which is susceptible to selection bias, and the lack of head-to-head cardiovascular outcome trials directly comparing dulaglutide to semaglutide or tirzepatide.
Diabetology international · Jun 2026DOI ↗ Review
This commentary examines the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) report on GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) — specifically semaglutide and tirzepatide — for obesity management, evaluating both their clinical value and the challenges surrounding their financing. The authors note that while these agents demonstrate meaningful weight loss and cardiometabolic benefits and were deemed cost-effective versus lifestyle modification alone by ICER, even modest real-world uptake surpasses ICER's annual budget impact threshold, raising access concerns. The commentary highlights that real-world persistence with these medications is notably lower than in clinical trials, leading to frequent weight regain upon discontinuation and limiting anticipated long-term medical cost offsets. Evidence on medical spending is described as mixed: cost-offset signals appear primarily in patients with both obesity and diabetes using high-potency injectable agents, while obesity-only populations may see spending increases. To address these tensions, the authors recommend pairing drug coverage with lifestyle management programs, avoiding arbitrary treatment duration limits, applying targeted prior authorization, and exploring innovative payment models. Key limitations include the commentary format, reliance on heterogeneous real-world data, and lack of primary data collection.
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · Jun 2026DOI ↗ Review
This review synthesizes evidence from randomized controlled trials and high-quality meta-analyses on approved and investigational obesity medications, examining their effects beyond weight loss alone. Medications reviewed include phentermine-topiramate, naltrexone-bupropion, GLP-1 receptor agonists (liraglutide, semaglutide), and newer multiagonist agents (tirzepatide, survodutide, mazdutide, retatrutide, cagrilintide-semaglutide, and amycretin). The authors evaluated impacts across a broad range of obesity-related comorbidities, including type 2 diabetes, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, cardiovascular disease, obstructive sleep apnea, polycystic ovary syndrome, osteoarthritis, muscle mass, depression, quality of life, food cravings, binge-eating disorders, substance use disorders, and neurodegenerative diseases. The review concludes that GLP-1-based and multiagonist therapies demonstrate beneficial effects across these conditions. Notably, the authors report that while many benefits appear to be mediated through weight reduction, accumulating evidence suggests weight loss-independent mechanisms, particularly for GLP-1 receptor agonist-based therapies. Key limitations include its reliance on synthesized rather than primary data and variability in evidence quality across the individual conditions reviewed.
The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · May 2026DOI ↗ Review
This narrative review examines the role of lifestyle interventions before, during, and after treatment with second-generation obesity management medications (OMMs), specifically semaglutide and tirzepatide. The authors note that these agents have demonstrated weight losses of approximately 15–20% in recent trials, prompting a reconsideration of how lifestyle programs should be integrated into obesity care. The review identifies several emerging concerns in the literature, including lean mass loss, nutritional deficiencies, gastrointestinal side effects, and significant weight regain following medication discontinuation. The authors argue that lifestyle modification remains the foundation of obesity treatment but that the focus may need to shift from weight reduction toward broader health promotion in the context of highly effective pharmacotherapy. Key lifestyle strategies discussed include protein intake and physical activity to preserve muscle mass, and dietary approaches to manage gastrointestinal side effects. The review also explores pre-treatment lifestyle programs as potential prerequisites for pharmacotherapy while cautioning that such requirements could limit access and reinforce weight stigma. Limitations include the narrative (non-systematic) design, lack of primary data, and the rapidly evolving evidence base. The authors conclude that optimal timing, frequency, and content of lifestyle interventions alongside OMMs remain unclear and warrant further research.
Current atherosclerosis reports · May 2026DOI ↗ Review
This review article argues that GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) — such as semaglutide and tirzepatide — should be understood as catalysts for, rather than replacements of, lifestyle intervention in cardiometabolic care. The authors propose the guiding principle "lifestyle first and lifestyle always, but not lifestyle only," acknowledging that GLP-1 RAs have produced meaningful clinical benefits including substantial weight loss, improved glycemic control, and reduced cardiovascular and renal risk. However, the authors contend that pharmacotherapy alone cannot address the full spectrum of cardiometabolic risk drivers, including sarcopenia, physical deconditioning, poor sleep, psychological stress, and social determinants of health. The article highlights that discontinuation of GLP-1 RAs without structured lifestyle support is commonly associated with weight regain. Key lifestyle pillars emphasized include high-quality nutrition, regular physical activity (including resistance training), restorative sleep, stress management, and social connectedness. The authors advocate for integrated, interprofessional care models combining pharmacologic and lifestyle strategies, supported by systemic and policy-level change. As a narrative review, the paper does not present original data, conduct a systematic literature search, or include a meta-analysis, which limits the directness of its evidentiary contribution.
American journal of lifestyle medicine · May 2026DOI ↗ Review
This systematic review examined the clinical outcomes of GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonists in children and adolescents (aged 6–19 years) with overweight or obesity, with or without type 2 diabetes. Researchers searched PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, ultimately analyzing 15 studies (12 interventional, 3 observational) comprising 1,448 participants across six agents: liraglutide, exenatide, semaglutide, dulaglutide, tirzepatide, and lixisenatide. Study durations ranged from 6 to 68 weeks. The review found that BMI reductions varied across agents and study designs, with semaglutide trials reporting reductions of up to –16.1%. A key finding was the substantial heterogeneity in how concomitant lifestyle interventions were reported—ranging from general dietary advice to structured multidisciplinary programs—making it impossible to isolate the independent contributions of pharmacological versus behavioral components. The authors conclude that while GLP-1 RAs appear to be a promising therapeutic option in this population, the evidence base is limited by inconsistent lifestyle co-intervention reporting. They call for standardized reporting frameworks (e.g., TIDieR), validated behavioral measures, and factorial or stratified study designs to disentangle drug and lifestyle effects in future pediatric trials.
Nutrients · May 2026DOI ↗ Review
This review examines the evolution of GLP-1–based pharmacotherapies for obesity, tracing the discovery of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and assessing the clinical efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), with particular focus on semaglutide. The authors explore proposed central mechanisms by which GLP-1RAs may reduce appetite and body weight. A substantial portion of the review addresses the "paradox" surrounding glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) targeting: both dual GLP-1R/GIPR agonism (as seen with tirzepatide) and GLP-1R agonism combined with GIPR antagonism (as seen with maridebart cafraglutide) appear to yield favorable metabolic outcomes. The authors note a lack of evidence that GIPR agonism or antagonism alone produces meaningful anorectic effects in humans, raising mechanistic questions about how GIPR modulation enhances GLP-1RA efficacy. The review concludes by exploring additional explanations for why dual-targeting compounds appear to outperform semaglutide monotherapy. As a narrative review, this paper synthesizes existing literature rather than generating new primary data, and its conclusions are dependent on the quality and scope of the studies reviewed.
Annual review of nutrition · May 2026DOI ↗ Review
This narrative review examines the relationship between diabetes mellitus (DM) and stroke, and evaluates the cerebrovascular potential of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonists (e.g., tirzepatide). The authors summarize evidence from large cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs), noting that agents such as semaglutide and liraglutide were associated with reductions in non-fatal stroke incidence, fewer hospitalizations, and improved neurological outcomes in patients with prior stroke or high cardiovascular risk. The review highlights that stroke reduction may represent a class effect of GLP-1 RAs, though differences between individual agents exist, attributed to variations in pharmacokinetics, receptor affinity, and study populations. Evidence in the acute stroke setting is described as preliminary, coming largely from early-phase or ongoing trials. The authors also discuss emerging agents—orforglipron, retatrutide, Maridebart cafraglutide, and CagriSema—as potential future options. Limitations acknowledged include the narrative (non-systematic) design, reliance on trial-level rather than individual patient data, and the absence of large-scale, long-term randomized trials specifically targeting post-stroke populations. The authors conclude that GLP-1-based therapies should currently be considered tools for long-term vascular risk reduction rather than established acute stroke treatments.
Pharmaceutics · May 2026DOI ↗ Review
This scoping review examined the relationship between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) — a class of medications used for type 2 diabetes and weight management — and hair loss (alopecia). Researchers searched PubMed for relevant articles published through April 2026. The review found conflicting evidence overall: some data suggested an association between GLP-1RA use (particularly semaglutide and tirzepatide) and telogen effluvium (a stress-related, diffuse hair shedding) as well as androgenic alopecia, with risk potentially tied to longer treatment duration, greater magnitude of weight loss, and higher doses. Proposed biological mechanisms included weight loss-induced physiological stress, changes in dermal white adipose tissue, and hormonal shifts, though the authors note their relative contributions remain poorly understood. Conversely, a smaller subset of literature indicated possible improvement in inflammatory forms of alopecia, especially in patients with underlying metabolic dysfunction. Key limitations include the scoping design's reliance on heterogeneous existing literature, absence of original clinical trial data, and the difficulty of disentangling drug effects from weight-loss effects. The authors conclude that dermatology practitioners should be aware of this association and consider patient counseling and monitoring.
Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · May 2026DOI ↗ Review
This review examines the potential of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) — including exenatide, semaglutide, dulaglutide, and the dual GLP-1R/GIP-R agonist tirzepatide — as pharmacological treatments for alcohol use disorder (AUD). The authors synthesized data from preclinical rodent and non-human primate studies, registered clinical trials, observational/pharmacoepidemiologic studies, and social media reports. In animal models, multiple GLP-1RAs were found to reduce alcohol consumption, alcohol-seeking behavior, alcohol-induced locomotor stimulation, reward memory, and relapse drinking, while also appearing to blunt alcohol's activation of the mesolimbic dopamine system. In the limited available human data, clinical trials of exenatide, semaglutide, and dulaglutide reported reductions in alcohol consumption, and pharmacoepidemiologic studies observed decreased rates of alcohol-related events among AUD patients prescribed GLP-1RAs or tirzepatide. The authors conclude that the GLP-1 system appears to be involved in AUD-related processes and that GLP-1RAs represent a promising but still tentative treatment avenue. Key limitations include the small number of human trials, heterogeneous study designs, and reliance on observational data for most clinical findings.
International journal of molecular sciences · May 2026DOI ↗ Review
This narrative review examines the potential role of incretin-based therapies in treating metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), a condition strongly linked to metabolic syndrome and a leading cause of chronic liver disease. The authors highlight that no approved pharmacological treatments currently exist for MASLD and that progression to advanced fibrosis poses a significant clinical challenge. The review synthesizes evidence on GLP-1 receptor agonists, which the authors report have shown efficacy in reducing hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis-related biomarkers, largely attributed to weight loss and improved insulin sensitivity. Dual agonists such as tirzepatide (GLP-1/GIP) are described as demonstrating superior hepatic and metabolic outcomes. Emerging agents including cotadutide (GLP-1/glucagon dual agonist) and retatrutide (GLP-1/GIP/glucagon triagonist) are presented as a novel frontier, with early clinical data suggesting potent hepatoprotective effects and favorable metabolic remodeling. The authors acknowledge that evidence on fibrosis progression remains limited. As a narrative review without systematic search methodology or meta-analysis, this paper is susceptible to selection bias and does not establish causality. It provides a useful synthesis of the current landscape but should be interpreted with appropriate caution.
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · May 2026DOI ↗ Review
This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-based therapies—primarily semaglutide and tirzepatide—for the management of obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Drawing on PubMed and Scopus literature published between January 2020 and March 2026, the authors incorporated randomized trials, pooled analyses, mechanistic studies, and observational data. The review describes how obesity-related HFpEF arises from a complex interplay of excess lipids, chronic inflammation, and metabolic dysregulation, which also interact with GLP-1 pathways. According to the authors, GLP-1-based therapies demonstrated meaningful improvements in symptoms, exercise capacity, and quality of life in this population, with benefits attributed to weight reduction, decreased systemic inflammation, and improved congestion indices. Tirzepatide was additionally associated with reductions in heart failure-related complications. Proposed mechanisms include coordinated effects on metabolism, inflammation, hemodynamics, and cardiac remodeling. The authors note that evidence for improvements in morbidity appears stronger than evidence for reductions in mortality. Key limitations include the narrative (non-systematic) review methodology, potential selection bias in study inclusion, and the absence of long-term mortality data. The authors conclude that further research is needed to clarify long-term outcomes, refine patient selection, and guide clinical integration.
Journal of clinical medicine · May 2026DOI ↗ Review
This registry-based cross-sectional qualitative analysis examined the landscape of completed clinical trials investigating GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) for obesity, using data retrieved from ClinicalTrials.gov in October 2025. The authors identified 227 completed interventional studies and analyzed their design characteristics, research themes, and outcome domains. Liraglutide was the most studied agent (n = 86), followed by semaglutide and tirzepatide (n = 18 each) and exenatide (n = 15). Phase 3 and 4 trials predominated, though most studies enrolled fewer than 200 participants, suggesting relatively modest individual sample sizes. The authors reported a notable surge in completed trials after 2018, coinciding with the emergence of newer GLP-1 analogues. Primary outcomes were predominantly weight-related, but the synthesis identified a growing research focus on hepatic, cardiometabolic, and inflammatory endpoints. The study's key limitation is its registry-based, qualitative design — it does not synthesize individual-level patient outcome data or conduct meta-analysis, and therefore cannot draw conclusions about comparative efficacy or safety. Rather, it maps the structural and thematic evolution of the GLP-1 obesity research field. The authors conclude that the field is maturing beyond glycaemic and weight outcomes toward broader organ-specific endpoints.
Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · May 2026DOI ↗ Review
This narrative review, aimed at obstetricians and gynecologists, synthesizes current evidence on GLP-1 receptor agonists (e.g., semaglutide) and dual GLP-1/GIP agonists (e.g., tirzepatide) as they relate to women's health. The authors highlight that phase 3 trials have reported 15–21% body weight reduction with these agents, with tirzepatide showing greater efficacy than semaglutide. In women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), the authors cite meta-analyses finding improvements in insulin resistance, androgen levels, and ovulation rates. Regarding contraception, the review notes that tirzepatide's gastric-emptying delay has prompted manufacturer guidance about backup contraception around initiation and dose escalation. On pregnancy safety, the authors describe emerging human cohort data suggesting no significantly increased risk of major congenital malformations from inadvertent early pregnancy exposure, while noting that animal teratogenicity data still warrant caution. Perioperative guidance has shifted toward individualized risk-stratified approaches rather than blanket discontinuation. The authors call for formal pregnancy registries to address persistent knowledge gaps. As a review, this paper does not generate new primary data, and its conclusions are limited by the underlying evidence base, which in several areas remains preliminary or indirect.
Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology · May 2026DOI ↗ Review
This narrative review examines whether tirzepatide — a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist — may act as a disease-modifying therapy in obesity-related obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), beyond its well-established effects on weight reduction. The authors searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science through January 2026, synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and mechanistic studies on incretin-based therapies in obesity and OSA. The review reports that tirzepatide is associated with meaningful reductions in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) alongside significant weight loss. Notably, the authors propose that OSA improvements may not be fully explained by weight loss alone, highlighting potential weight-independent mechanisms such as modulation of systemic inflammation, improvements in insulin sensitivity, changes in adipokine profiles, and effects on autonomic regulation and ventilatory chemosensitivity. The authors acknowledge that current evidence is insufficient to definitively separate weight-dependent from weight-independent effects, and they call for dedicated mechanistic and long-term clinical studies. A key limitation is the review's narrative — rather than systematic — design, which introduces selection bias. The paper frames tirzepatide as a potential shift from purely device-based OSA management toward integrated, pathophysiology-driven treatment strategies, but stops short of confirming disease-modifying status.
Life (Basel, Switzerland) · May 2026DOI ↗ Review
This narrative review evaluates whether incretin-based therapies — specifically GLP-1 receptor agonists (e.g., semaglutide) and dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonists (e.g., tirzepatide) — warrant consideration as first-line antihypertensive agents. The authors synthesize findings from recent large-scale trials demonstrating that these agents are associated with significant reductions in body weight, blood pressure, and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Mediation analyses cited in the review suggest that weight loss accounts for a substantial portion of the observed blood pressure reductions; however, the authors also highlight putative direct mechanisms, including improvements in vascular function, renal sodium handling, and neurohumoral pathway modulation. The review notes that beneficial effects on blood pressure appear consistent across diverse patient populations, including those without established hypertension. A key limitation acknowledged by the authors is the absence of randomized controlled trials specifically designed with blood pressure as a primary endpoint. Based on the available evidence, the authors conclude that incretin-based therapies may have an emerging role in hypertension management guidelines, particularly for selected high-risk populations. As a review article, conclusions are dependent on the quality and interpretation of the underlying primary studies cited.
Current hypertension reports · May 2026DOI ↗ Review
This paper argues that body image has been largely overlooked in research on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1s) such as semaglutide and tirzepatide, despite its central relevance to why people seek these treatments and how they psychologically adjust to the bodily changes that follow. Drawing on existing literature across body image, weight loss interventions, weight stigma, and cosmetic procedures, the authors conceptualise body image not simply as an outcome of GLP-1 use, but as a motivator, mediator, and moderator across the entire treatment trajectory. The paper identifies several critical research gaps, including the absence of prospective and longitudinal studies tracking body image before, during, and after GLP-1 use, as well as limited understanding of individual vulnerability factors and heterogeneity in psychological responses. The authors also highlight broader societal concerns, including the potential reinforcement of weight stigma, inequities in access to these medications, and the role of media representation. They call for body image-informed psychological support for people using GLP-1s, as well as professional education and training. As a narrative review, the paper does not present new empirical data and its conclusions are based on inference from adjacent literatures rather than direct evidence.
Body image · Apr 2026DOI ↗