Moderate · human
This systematic review and meta-analysis pooled data from 33 randomized controlled trials (n = 12,028 adults with overweight or obesity) to evaluate whether combining lifestyle modifications with GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) produces greater improvements in body weight and cardiometabolic markers than lifestyle modification plus placebo. Searches covered PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library through May 2025, and the protocol was pre-registered on PROSPERO. The study found that the combination therapy was associated with a statistically significant mean weight reduction of 7.13 kg, along with improvements in waist circumference, fat mass, systolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL cholesterol. HDL cholesterol did not show a significant change. Subgroup analyses suggested that longer treatment duration, use of semaglutide or tirzepatide, weekly dosing, and trials conducted in North America were associated with larger weight loss effects. No included trials were rated high risk of bias. GRADE certainty ranged from low to high across outcomes, with heterogeneity and potential publication bias limiting confidence in several findings. The authors conclude that results should be interpreted cautiously given this variability in evidence certainty.
EClinicalMedicine · Aug 2025DOI ↗ Moderate · human
This multicentre retrospective observational study used TriNetX, a global healthcare data platform, to examine real-world associations between semaglutide use and survival outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Researchers identified over 1.1 million eligible patients, of whom 14,511 initiated semaglutide and 69,700 initiated sitagliptin between 2018 and 2020. After propensity score matching to balance baseline characteristics, 13,703 patients were included in each group. The study found that the semaglutide group had a significantly lower 3-year incidence of all-cause death (7.2% vs. 9.5%) compared with the sitagliptin group. Secondary outcomes including acute heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and stroke also favored semaglutide. The authors note these findings are consistent with the randomized FLOW trial. Key limitations include the retrospective, non-randomized design, potential for residual confounding despite propensity score matching, reliance on administrative coding data, and the inability to account for medication adherence or dosing details. Findings should be interpreted as associative, not causal.
Open heart · Jul 2025DOI ↗ Moderate · human
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined treatments for female sexual desire, arousal, and orgasmic (DAO) dysfunction, explicitly excluding patients with sexual pain conditions. Researchers searched six major databases through December 2024, screening 8,994 abstracts and ultimately including 36 studies (26 RCTs and 10 single-arm trials). Treatments evaluated included cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT, 10 studies), medications (24 studies), and devices (2 studies). Meta-analyses were feasible for three interventions: mindfulness-based CBT, flibanserin, and bremelanotide, all assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS). The study found that mindfulness-based CBT was associated with significant improvements in total FSFI and DAO subscales; flibanserin was associated with improvements in total FSFI and the desire subscale; and bremelanotide was associated with improvements in total FSFI and both the desire and arousal subscales. All three treatments were associated with reduced sexual distress. Key limitations include the absence of direct head-to-head comparisons between CBT and pharmacotherapy, heterogeneous terminology across studies, varying outcome measures, and insufficient data to draw conclusions about most other treatments reviewed.
Journal of minimally invasive gynecology · Jun 2025DOI ↗ Moderate · human
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of Thymosin alpha 1 (Tα1), an immunomodulatory peptide, in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Researchers searched five major databases through February 2025 and identified five randomized controlled trials encompassing 706 SAP patients, comparing Tα1 treatment against non-Tα1 controls. The pooled analysis found that Tα1 was associated with increased percentages of CD4+ T cells and improved CD4+/CD8+ ratios, suggesting a positive effect on immune cell balance and reduction of immune suppression. Lower-dose Tα1 was associated with significantly reduced C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, an inflammation marker. Tα1 was also associated with a potential reduction in extrapancreatic infection risk. The authors concluded that Tα1 may regulate immune cell balance and exert anti-inflammatory effects in SAP patients, potentially improving prognosis. Key limitations include the small number of included trials (n=5), the relatively modest total patient population, heterogeneity in dosing protocols, and the predominance of studies from a single country (China), which may limit generalizability. The authors noted that further research is needed to validate these findings.
Frontiers in immunology · Jun 2025DOI ↗ Moderate · human
This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated the comparative efficacy and safety of dual and triple incretin-based agonists — compounds targeting combinations of GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon receptors — versus standard therapies for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Researchers searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase through July 2024, identifying randomized controlled trials assessing outcomes including body weight, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose (FBG), adverse events (AEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs). The analysis found that Retatrutide (a triple agonist) was associated with the greatest weight reduction, while Tirzepatide (a dual GLP-1/GIP agonist) showed the largest reductions in both FBG and HbA1c. Regarding safety, Tirzepatide and Cotadutide were associated with increased AEs, whereas Semaglutide was associated with reduced SAEs. The authors suggest that receptor-specific targeting may help personalize T2DM treatment. Key limitations include small sample sizes in some included trials, short study durations, and reliance on indirect comparisons in the network meta-analysis. The authors acknowledge that direct head-to-head trials are needed to confirm these findings. The study was prospectively registered (PROSPERO: CRD42024532368).
Acta diabetologica · Jun 2025DOI ↗ Moderate · human
This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the weight-loss effectiveness of tirzepatide versus semaglutide in humans by searching PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science through January 2025. From 751 initial records, seven studies were ultimately included — two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and five retrospective cohort studies. Using a random-effects model in RStudio, the authors pooled mean differences (MDs) in body weight change between the two agents. The analysis found that tirzepatide was associated with statistically significantly greater weight loss compared to semaglutide (MD = 4.23 kg; 95% CI: 3.22–5.25). Subgroup analyses suggested that higher tirzepatide doses (>10 mg) and longer treatment durations (>6 months) were associated with progressively larger weight differences. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias version 2 tool for RCTs; the authors reported high quality and low risk of bias overall. Publication bias was evaluated via forest plots and Egger's test. Limitations include the small number of included studies (only two RCTs), reliance on retrospective real-world data for most of the analysis, potential heterogeneity across study populations, and the possibility of residual confounding in the observational studies.
Journal of clinical medicine research · May 2025DOI ↗ Moderate · human
This paper reports a prespecified subgroup analysis from a phase 2 randomized controlled trial examining how sex and baseline BMI influenced the efficacy and safety of survodutide, a dual glucagon/GLP-1 receptor agonist, in adults without diabetes who had a BMI ≥27 kg/m². A total of 387 participants were randomized to one of four once-weekly subcutaneous survodutide doses or placebo over 46 weeks, which included a 20-week dose-escalation phase followed by a 26-week maintenance phase. The study found that, across survodutide-treated groups, females experienced greater reductions in both bodyweight and waist circumference compared with males. Participants who started with a lower baseline BMI showed proportionally greater bodyweight reductions, while those with a higher baseline BMI showed greater absolute reductions in waist circumference. Adverse event rates were broadly comparable across sex and BMI subgroups, with nausea being the most common gastrointestinal side effect reported in all subgroups. Key limitations include the descriptive (non-inferential) nature of the subgroup analyses, the relatively modest sample size when subdivided by subgroup, and potential confounding from COVID-19-related treatment discontinuations. These findings suggest differential responses by sex and baseline BMI, but the subgroup design limits causal conclusions.
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · Jan 2025DOI ↗ Moderate · human
This meta-analysis pooled data from 18 treatment arms across multiple randomized controlled trials (total n = 1,029 participants) to evaluate the effect of injectable survodutide — a dual glucagon and GLP-1 receptor agonist — on obesity-related outcomes. Searches were conducted across major databases through August 2024. Using a random-effects model, the authors found that survodutide was associated with statistically significant reductions in body weight (weighted mean difference: −8.33 kg), BMI (−4.03 kg/m²), and waist circumference (−6.33 cm) compared to control groups. Subgroup analyses suggested that longer intervention durations (more than 16 weeks) and higher doses were associated with greater reductions in weight and waist circumference, a pattern also supported by meta-regression. Key limitations include very high statistical heterogeneity for weight (I² = 99.6%) and waist circumference (I² = 99.5%), which may reflect substantial differences in study populations, doses, and durations across the included trials. The relatively small total participant count and the emerging nature of the evidence base for survodutide also limit the certainty of conclusions. The findings suggest a potential role for survodutide in weight management, but the high heterogeneity warrants cautious interpretation.
Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · Nov 2024DOI ↗ Moderate · human
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the weight-loss efficacy and safety of cagrilintide (an amylin analogue) alone and in combination with semaglutide 2.4 mg (referred to as "Cagrisema") compared to placebo or active comparators (semaglutide or liraglutide) in adults with obesity. Researchers searched electronic databases and identified 3 eligible randomized controlled trials encompassing 430 participants. The pooled analysis found that Cagrisema was associated with significantly greater percentage and absolute body weight reduction compared to semaglutide 2.4 mg alone over 20–32 weeks, though with notably high statistical heterogeneity (I² up to 98%). Cagrilintide monotherapy showed statistically similar weight loss to semaglutide or liraglutide over 26–32 weeks. Regarding safety, treatment-emergent and serious adverse events were broadly comparable across groups; however, gastrointestinal adverse events and vomiting were significantly more frequent with Cagrisema versus semaglutide, while vomiting was significantly lower with cagrilintide monotherapy versus semaglutide or liraglutide. Key limitations include the very small number of included trials (n=3), limited total sample size, short-to-medium follow-up durations, and very high heterogeneity, which tempers confidence in the pooled estimates.
Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism · Sep 2024DOI ↗ Moderate · human
This phase 2 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of survodutide (BI 456906), a glucagon receptor and GLP-1 receptor dual agonist, for weight management in adults with obesity but without diabetes. Across 43 centres in 12 countries, 386 participants (BMI ≥27 kg/m²) were assigned to one of four subcutaneous survodutide doses or placebo, administered once weekly for 46 weeks. The primary endpoint was percentage change in bodyweight from baseline to week 46. The study found dose-dependent reductions in bodyweight across all survodutide groups compared to placebo, ranging from approximately -6.2% to -14.9% versus -2.8% for placebo. Gastrointestinal adverse events were the most common side effects, occurring in 75% of survodutide recipients compared to 42% of placebo recipients. Notably, only about 60% of participants completed the full 46-week treatment period, and the study was not powered to establish definitive efficacy or compare doses head-to-head. As an industry-funded phase 2 dose-finding trial, these results are considered preliminary and intended to inform larger confirmatory studies.
The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · Feb 2024DOI ↗ Moderate · human
This Phase II randomised controlled trial evaluated survodutide (BI 456906), a dual glucagon receptor/GLP-1 receptor agonist, across six dose groups compared with placebo and open-label semaglutide (1.0 mg once weekly) in 413 adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin background therapy. Over 16 weeks, survodutide produced dose-dependent reductions in HbA1c and bodyweight. Higher dose groups achieved HbA1c reductions of approximately 17–19 mmol/mol (~1.6–1.7%), broadly comparable to semaglutide (~16 mmol/mol, ~1.5%), while lower doses showed smaller reductions. Bodyweight decreased dose-dependently, with the highest-dose groups producing greater reductions (up to ~8.7%) than semaglutide (~5.3%). Adverse events, predominantly gastrointestinal, were reported in ~78% of survodutide-treated participants versus ~52% in both the placebo and semaglutide groups. Limitations include the relatively short 16-week treatment duration, the open-label (non-blinded) design of the semaglutide comparator arm, and the Phase II exploratory nature of the trial, which was not powered for head-to-head superiority conclusions. The trial was funded by Boehringer Ingelheim.
Diabetologia · Dec 2023DOI ↗